More umpires cheating? Ramiz Raja 'RUN OUT' Perth 1987.......

No description available.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Ramiz
• run
• out
• 1987

[jpcrabtree1]

Not cheating as you incorrectly put it. Try buying a rule book and read it.

[robelinda2]

@jpcrabtree1 dickhead, notice the QUESTION MARK.......as in ASKING A FUCKING QUESTION....

[saadikins69]

If the batsman was walking back because he did not hear the no ball call and a run out is attempted then he would not be run out it would be a dead ball as was the case in the 92 final where the batsman was again Ramiz caught off a no ball which he did not hear and was walking back. Hick tried to run him out but missed the stumps Bucknor had already called it a dead ball by then. Over here he was not walking back but attempting a run as the pavillion was the other way where he eventually headed.

[stratocaster1986able]

NOT CHEATING. CHECK THE FUCKING RULES.

[yunnes09]

15 from 40. That is really disgusting

[dj6ful]

its not cheating but its very stupid running

[laiq350]

@saadikins69 watch carefully @ 0:45 he turned back to the bowlers end, where the pavilion is placed, and even the umpire wasn´t looking he was just signaling no ball. and in the end the bowlers expression shows all, that this is a cheap way to get someone out

[Subash0069]

I would have called him back. 15 runs in 40 balls. I know ODI was knew back then but still 15 runs of almost 7 over: I would have never wanted him to go to the pavillion.

[Bhuddababajee]

this is cheating Bucknor's call in 92 final was correct. teams that take wickets like that only shows one thing they are not quality teams as they can not get the opposition out through legal deliveries.

To: stratocaster1986able (read the rules again its not out and you are a moron)

[MegaDevilsoul]

@Malincanada exactly and that is y umpires started calling it a dead ball when this situation occured.. it started happening may be after this incident bcoz i remember during a Pak vs West Indies WC'92 match , ramiz was caught off a no ball and he again had left his crease without knowing that it was a no ball , and the fielding side tried to run him out but the umpire quickly called it a dead ball...im not sure y ramiz cudnt pick this no ball:S the one in a wc game was a shoulder height no ball

[nk7792]

The only way that could have been not out, was if the fielding team either decided to not appeal, or after the batsman was given out run out, then they could have retracted their appeal. By the rules, the umpires did what they were supposed to.

[Malincanada]

The law (27.7) says "An umpire shall intervene if satisfied that a batsman, not having been given out, has left his wicket under a misapprehension that he is out."

Clearly he thought he was out, but that wasn't the reason he left his wicket. However, The reason he didn't regain his ground WAS because he thought he was out.

I think the law needs a tweak to make it specifically about the actions of the batsman AFTER his misapprehension occurs not about the initial reason he left his ground.