wtc_build1
Top Comments
All Comments (124)
-
You can see the critical column that failed which caused the collapse...
-
@admx94 Wasting your time? Hahahaha, You are a waste of fucking space and oxygen. Do some research. Apparently office fires don't actually last that long before moving on to the next area with fuel. NIST ignored data they didn't like and inflated the fuel figures until they managed to create a model that produced a collapse pattern like the one seen on 911. They asked staff about what was on the floors. Chose the densest level and applied that to the entire floor, despite some floors being empty
-
@CalumGilhooly You don't have the mental capacity for reality. Stop wasting my time.
-
@admx94 The fuel loading for each area of the floors affected by fire give a burn time of around twenty minutes before the fuel is exhausted and the fire moves on. No idea what you are dribbling about the book and paper and pressure, sounds like you are tripping on something, your tongue certainly. Got a job thanks and a wife and family. Grow up!
-
@CalumGilhooly where do you get your facts about the fires burning for 20 min????? Try this experiment... drop a book onto the floor so that it lands flat... you may even put peices of paper under and around it before hand. Then! Notice how the paper will FLY OUTWARD AS THE BOOK NEARS THE FLOOR! This is because of the massive amount of possitive pressure produced in such an event. NOW! multiply that by ______ (?) to apply to a skyscraper and MAYBE you will understand. get jobs people
-
@admx94 Really? andd what fuel was feeding those fires for HOURS? Where are the massive, all engulfing flames from such an inferno? All we see are normal office fires that moved around the building as they consumed the available fuel, office furnishings, paper and other equipment. These fires would burn for approx 20 mins and then move on, nowhere near long enough or hot enough to affect structural steel. GIRFUY!
-
@trevorpickering So all the firefighters who decided that it was going to collapse from the fire and decided to evacuate the building in preparation for that exact event are idiots? I'm sure you're much more knowledgable about firefighting. Dipshit.
-
@mmmlink Wheres the damage to the right front corner fuchead??
What kind off jackass video is this??
-
The building fell, because the fires burned inside the lower floors for HOURS...also the floors under the fires were ACTUALLY a sub-station... most people don't even know that... yet they try to make up theories about why wtc7 collapsed... it fell quickly b/c the bottom was taken out beneath most of the buildings weight!!! Haven't any of you ever played jenga????? Gtfo
-
Oops, sorry, i didn't get that people were talking about 9/11 here.
I can't say nothing about this terrorist attack.
I'm just very sorry for all the victims and families.
Do you know anyone who has applied for a building permit in NYC to do ANYTHING? To say the process is onerous is an understatement. So along comes WTC7 for approval. An unusual design, one that is supposedly inadequate in hindsight.. So inadequate that the the entire structure drops like a controlled demolition because of fires and debris damage. But the approval process was no problem for WTC7. THAT FACT ALONE is worthy of an aggressive investigation.
Skeptic121 2 years ago 6
reading thought the comments no one has sugested larry or the goverment did it, people are just pointing out fire did not destry wtc7 which you would be an imbecile to think fire did that
trevorpickering 4 years ago 5