Scalia: Women's Rights Not In Constitution

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
24,814
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • America is the country where people don't believe in evolution. Where they trust in the "skygod". Where faith conquers science, logic, and deductive reasoning.

    The place where Bush won twice. Hell, the fact that he got even 40%, 30% of the vote is sad.

    Where Palin, O'Donell, and Angle are potential winners in their categories.

    Who's #1 name in news is Faux.

    Where the "other guys" (Dems) are sellouts douches.

    Where 3rd parties are ignored.

    This is obviously some cruel joke we're playing.

  • Great video! Thanks a lot for speaking up for us!

see all

All Comments (775)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what do u expect from the oligarch's court? this douchebag is a prime example of consistency being the hobobln of small minds masquerading as learning. Hes a total jackass.

  • The problem with "womens rights" is its usually the Sluts and Whores with their hands out first demanding some kind of undeserving privelege.

  • Cenk was a Conservative?

  • The 'Founding Fathers' feared big business?!? And made pamphlets against them... wtf? This entire piece was a total hack job....

  • Scalia is a sucker of satan's cock.

  • if you have to every talk to a coc#-sucker like Scalia, copy and paste the whole damn constituion and rights. (Related Amendments, 13th:1865 14th:1868 15th:1870 19th:1920 26th:1971). are we all in? the show is about to start. Scalia is a disgrace to pathetic assholes the world over.

  • The rights of blacks not mentioned in the constitution either.

  • Its funny reading the transcripts of the floor debates over the 14th Amendment back in the post-Civil War era. An opponent of the equal protection clause said that he can't support the language since it sounds like it wouldn't apply just to the freed slaves, but to women as well. Then the sponsor and drafter of the Amendment reassures him that it most certainly wouldn't apply to women. I don't support it at all, but no one can argue that the EP clause was never meant to protect women

  • i agree with some of what you said, but i can tell you dont really understand his judicial philosophy. you also discredited yourself with the name calling. you should debate scalia on constitutional law.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more