11. Evolution vs. Creationism:Evolution Essential to Education
Top Comments
All Comments (265)
-
-
Will "clones" who behave, think, act and feel like humans be considered under the "Creationist" heading or the "Evolutionary" heading?
This kind of questioning might already be happening in high school science classes. What kind of answer should the science teacher give the kids?
-
-
"there is an enormous probability problem at the core of Darwinist and neo-Darwinist theory"
lol, no there isn't.
-
This probability problem is not the delusion of some radical scientific fringe. As stated by William Fix:
Whether one looks to mutations or gene flow for the source of the variations needed to fuel evolution, there is an enormous probability problem at the core of Darwinist and neo-Darwinist theory, which has been cited by hundreds of scientists and professionals. Engineers, physicists, astronomers, and biologists who have looked at the fact see The evolutionists are assuming the impossible.
-
@MrKGatl Let me show you why i dont believe in atheist philosophy about a new men godless. Read your own comment : "Just because Russia has a lot of corruption, doesnt mean that corruption and atheism are in any way linked..." Now read your comment in this youtube channel: "Or we could just burn them at the stake like they wouldnt have done to us a few hundred years ago..." That's why I say that american atheist are 90% inmoral liar, and stupid people. Now, stop send me you comments, please.
-
The highest concentration of people who do not believe in evolution are trailer parks
You know you just made up this comment without any evidence it is true
I guess lying comes natural to militant atheists when their faith in evolution is chanledged.
I don't bother making up stories about how atheist dogfaces have complete faith in evolution despite the new evidence that shows the odds of creating a new spicies is 1 in 100 milllion. A person would have to been and idiot to believe this is so
-
hey idiot These are the odds of getting just any kind of non-harmful mutations of five related genes. In order to create a new structure, however, the mutated genes must integrate or function in concert with one another. According to Professor Ambrose, the difficulties of obtaining non-harmful mutations of five related genes "fade into insignificance when we recognize that there must be a close integration of functions between the individual genes of the cluster, which must also be integrated
What do you mean by saying that viruses add no new info when inside a cell, Warriorprince? Have you ever heard of the swine flu? It crossed over into humans because of antigenic shift. That term means two different strains can exchange genes and come up with a new virulent strain which can cross from one species of host to another. The pandemic of 1918 was an earlier example. These cell parasites are excellent vectors for carrying genes from one host to another. This is serious evolution.
prschuster 1 year ago 6
Actually you are wrong. When a virus replicates itself inside a cell, it sometimes incorporates a part of the host's DNA. This can have a neutral, positive, or negative effect on the virus, and is a very essential part in viral evolution.
Alakrit 2 years ago 4