Final Justice PSA: Since When Did Heterosexuality Become Bigotry?

Homosexuals have made and are making their point very clear:
"FOLLOW US AND OUR AGENDA or SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES!"

Throughout the entire second half of 2010, homosexualists have come out of the woodwork like wildfire to claim victory against heterosexuality, humanity, the male/female dynamic, morality, spirituality/spiritual guidance, the family unit, gender equality and equality overall. Their language of today is so very telling, it is practically reminiscent of the infiltration scene of "Independence Day" in which Will Smith says of the aliens "I think they're planning an invasion".

They don't care anymore, and we told you this would happen.

The language of today is that if you are heterosexual (and most specifically, if you DEFEND the natural bond between a man and a woman), you are automatically classified a hater and/or a bigot. But how can love between a man and a woman be "bigoted", especially when... that's how the human race continues to exist?

Why is being heterosexual such a "hateful" thing, all of a sudden?

Why do homosexualists and anarcho-athiests insist on continuing the gender war? (The answers should be quite obvious, but the question needs to be asked just the same.)

What will YOU do to challenge this farce of terms?

STILL THINK HETEROSEXUALITY ISN'T EQUATED TO BIGOTRY?
Check out anarcho-atheist LatumWay's video from August 12, 2011:
"Heterosexual Pride Day (a.k.a. Bigot Pride Day)"
Although part of the video's description and opening annotation
attempts to detract the reality of the title's clear meaning,
both the content AND the title speak for themselves.


________________________________________________________

FINAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT
Real Men... Real Women... Standing Together In Real Truth!

"SILENCE IS NOT AN OPTION!"

Category:

Education

Tags:

• homosexualism
• homosexuality
• homosexual
• gay
• homo-fem
• Lesbian
• bisexual
• transgender
• transsexual
• transvestite
• gay marriage
• hatred
• hate
• queer
• liberalism
• bigotry
• propaganda
• NOM
• totalitarism
• political terrorism
• LGBT. gender separatism
• misandry
• radical feminist
• feminism
• anti-male
• feminization of men and boys
• absolutism
• gender
• gender war
• FJM
• Final Justice Movement
• FinalJusticeMovement

[Jamieishere1]

This video is barely worth commenting on but I just wanted to point out that it's ironic that you showed flowers in the beginning, given your overall message and that the vast majority of flowering plants are natural hermaphrodites.

The reason the video is worthless btw is because you claim that LGBT people in general hold a view which clearly they do not. I do not hold this "gender separatism" view and have never heard of anybody doing so.

[FinalJusticeMovement]

JAMIE:

"The reason the video is worthless is because you claim that LGBT

people in general hold a view which clearly they do not. I do not hold

this "gender separatism" view and have never heard of anybody doing so."

>> Anything is only "worthless" to someone who doesn't understand

value (or, in this case, VALUES). Just because YOU may not hold this

particular view doesn't mean that that view doesn't exist. You're too busy

trying to prove us wrong that you're just NOT PAYING ATTENTION!!

--FJ

[XXBleedingrose]

I'm in a man woman relationship, and I am not a bigot. I have tons of friends in the lgbt community, and I am pansexual myself. I like the same gender waaaaaaay more. like exclusively but I can love anyone. Most ppl assume I'm straight, and no one assumes I'm a bigot.

Maybe its the way that you talk about wanting to keep your kids from knowing that ppl are gay that makes it bigotry. Being white isn't bigotry, but sheltering kids from seeing black ppl exist is.

[FinalJusticeMovement]

BLEEDING ROSE: "Maybe its the way that you talk about wanting to keep your kids from knowing that ppl are gay that makes it bigotry." >> It's not about keeping kids from knowing that homosexuals exist, but rather about preventing them from engaging in physically, emotionally, spiritually, and politically dangerous behaviors AT A YOUNG AGE. ROSE: "Being white isn't bigotry, but sheltering kids from seeing black ppl exist is." True, but ethnicity is NOT homosexuality. --FJ

[Clel0005]

@FinalJusticeMovement I'm not a hater. I don't hate you FJ. I pity you. You are a lost cause. You will hate, misinform, harass, and deceive not because your beliefs are justified by evidence or reason, but because you are scared or a changing world, and too intellectually lazy or dishonest to re-evaluate your prejudices and you will live your entire life in the darkness of the hate and fear of an imaginary god.

[cboneofenglewood]

Great video. Thanks once again.

[Jamieishere1]

@FinalJusticeMovement Whether or not the view exists is irrelevant to whether or not homosexuals in general hold it. Your video seems to imply that all or most homosexuals hold the views you describe... which clearly isn't the case.

[Fireflygamer]

@FinalJusticeMovement "Are you also suggesting that men and women never had a purpose for one another other than mere reproduction? Sounds like radical feminism talking" no i never said that again you put words in my mouth. It was a hypothetical situation were everyone in the world was gay. I think that both genders are impotent, just because I don't fall in love with the opponent gender or wish to have sex with them dose not mean I do not see there value. stop misrepresenting my argument!

[Fireflygamer]

@FinalJusticeMovement No they are not robots, i never said that, again you put words in my mouth you seem to like strewman arguments, probably because you cant win an argument any other way. No men and women are not robots, but they will suffer a lot of discomfort in order to bring a baby into this world. Just look at what child brith dose to a woman body and we are happy to go through that for a child, so uncomfortable sex is a small price to pay for a baby.

[FinalJusticeMovement]

FREFLY: "even if everyone was gay, men and women would still have sex just to make babies if need be." >> So, what you're suggesting is that men and women are no more than robots who bang on each other and occasionally manufacture new robots for the same process in that vicious cycle? Do you take humanity to be THAT primitive? Are you also suggesting that men and women never had a purpose for one another other than mere reproduction? Sounds like radical feminism talking. --The Final Justice

[FinalJusticeMovement]

I pulled nothing out of anywhere, Firefly.

If the way someone was influenced into homosexuality was not by

abuse, coercion, reprobate parenting, or indoctrination/socialization,

then it was self-driven by a rebellious mindset. People DO make their

own decisions, you know. I have no problem with disagreement and

I have never denied the testimonies and manufactured stats that favor

the homosexualist agenda, but YOU are denying GENERATIONS of

factual research that clearly cancels them out.

--FJ