Philosophy of Gordon Clark, ed. Nash part 1; Divine Simplicity; Participation in God
Loading...
Loading...
161
views
Loading...
15:14
Do You Know What You Believe Part 4; What is God? Part B The Trump Argument for Scripturalismby drakeshelton163 views- 15:08
Dionysius the Areopagite; The Church's Big Mistake; First Century Disciple of Paul?; Neoplatonismby drakeshelton154 views
- 13:24
Do You Know What You Believe? Part 1 What is Knowledge? Pre-Socraticsby drakeshelton131 views
- 1:17
"Wonderland "- Dedicated To Drake Sheltonby SALUTETHEADMIRED157 views
- 13:42
Ed Nash- Young Entrepreneur, Fit or Fuglyby TeenBusinessForum325 views
- 1:17
Gordon Clark comments on "compatibilist" language.by fivepointbaptist277 views
- 15:38
Why Gordon Clark didn't say: Our Good Works Are Necessary To Salvation.by cccathena372 views
- 15:48
Do You Know What You Believe? Part 2; Platoby drakeshelton64 views
- 17:03
Do You Know What You Believe? Part 5; What is God? Part C Procession of the Spiritby drakeshelton105 views
- 16:11
Do You Know What You Believe? Part 3 What is God? Part Aby drakeshelton93 views
- 15:09
Tripartite Distinction part 2; DA Carson and Tom Schreiner: Anabaptist Hereticsby drakeshelton171 views
- 8:00
Altered States: Gordon Clark - National Physical Laboratoryby DesignLDN253 views
- 15:13
Is God beyond being/predicaton? Gordon Clark Language and Theology Part 1by drakeshelton163 views
- 15:30
Why I Hate Atheism; 6 Reasonsby drakeshelton206 views
- 10:18
Why I am not an Ancient Christian; Jewish Synagogue; Iconography; Dura -Europosby drakeshelton167 views
- 10:10
Soren kierkegaard / Irrationalism Refuted By Gordon Clark--5by ClarkApologetics652 views
- 3:56
Gordon Clark: Access Montgomery TV Candidate Statementby ClarkforCongress428 views
- 14:26
Why I am not a Roman Catholic; 10 Argumentsby drakeshelton243 views
- 12:23
The Triads 2; Gregory Palamas on Sensationby drakeshelton122 views
- 5:33
Reply to Shelton on ADS 1by acolyte4236307 views
I don't see why it would be wrong to say we participate in the creation which is an accurate translation of the being of God in the language of time space and matter. If creation is contingent then it seems wrong to say all its parts exist distinctly and necessarily in the mind of God before creation. If this were true it would be almost like arguing that the universe can exist without a creator. It would be like arguing for a cosmic plenum. As these things must be untrue God must be simple.
BeholdTheCross 4 months ago