Response to a "Neutral" Observer

I've gotten some bizarre video responses over the last couple of years. This latest one possibly makes the top ten, at least in terms of pure strangeness.

Response to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw14bJ6O_JQ

Video isn't choppy like last time, but the video and audio were out of sync upon completion. I tried to correct the issue in Sound Forge. It now clears up, for the most part, at least to the point of being watchable.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Atheist
• Atheism
• Agnostic
• Problem
• NightVisionPhantom
• Christ
• Christian
• logic
• science
• evolution
• what
• the
• hell
• lamarridley2

[tampa76]

Jesus saves! your a heathan and will burn in hell

[LibertyIsNotGiven]

@tampa76

So I'm frequently told.

[logoth80]

i think 'adaptation' as it stands for, is what opponents of evolution tought of.

as in creatures adapt to their surroundings by positive ways, not by negative selection.

for example hipothesis that humans got stronger jaws becouse they chew more, not becouse those with weaker jaws kept dying.

that is ofcourse exactly how world does not work. and i think thats what he meant.

[LibertyIsNotGiven]

It doesn't matter. He didn't even know what he was talking about, let alone convey his thoughts coherently. Even if what you say is true, you're simply alluding to natural selection, which as you probably know is a mechanism of evolution.

[logoth80]

i probably werent clear.

many ppl (wrongly) belive that 'adaptation' is not selective proces.

for example: if i go to gym for 2years after having first child, my second child will be stronger. thats how ppl still think we 'progress'

so he saying 'adaptation' probably didnt mean 'by natural selection'.

that shows him as even less educated.

[LibertyIsNotGiven]

Maybe, but he said science has "only" proven adaptation, so I assume he acknowledges that organisms change under environmental pressure. Of course, as one might infer from his latest stint here, in which he snapped and removed all his comments, he could very well be every bit as ignorant as you suggest.

[EsotericThrone]

That summary at the end was pretty soul crushing. Kudos.

[Scrapheap71]

this guy is using the tired old "Neutral agnostic ploy. They claim neutrality, then procede to take a theistic position.

Same old tire bullshit we've heard before.

[ReligionInTheBin]

Ghaha, standard fallacies and made up definitions...it's the only way theists can convince themselves of having actual arguments, pathetic!

[LibertyIsNotGiven]

I've never driven anyone into a psychotic rage before. First time for everything, I guess.

[LibertyIsNotGiven]

Hey, you're not only an angry bastard, but one strange duck, too!

[LibertyIsNotGiven]

Dude, nobody "dragged" you into anything. You inserted yourself into an extant discussion that had nothing to do with you, then you made a series of harebrained proclamations you couldn't defend. Let's not rewrite history here.