Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

LeWeb'08: Dr. Brian Cox

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,267
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 15, 2009

LeWeb'08
Dr. Brian Cox
The School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester
DAY 2 - DEC 10, 2008

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Shame to the people in charge of the cameras!!!!!!

  • Thank You........Easy to understand .....Well.......it gave me a starting point...no lots of starting points......to look into .......its great that guys that know...like Brian.....can tell in easy ways ....that anyone can enjoy........BLINK OF AN EYE ......

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • so meny people listen to you brian you fool large parts of the papulation ,with your theories , einstain einstain he is not enough for celectial knowledge ,one day youll understand till then go on and spread the mist people are anyway quite stupid

  • No sirve al no mostrar las diapositivas que describe el Dr Cox!

  • @maureenOWW

    On what basis do you make that assertion? Lots of physicists think the infinite may exist. The only thing we know so far is that infinity usally indicates a mathematical discrepancy- and required a new theory. Assuming the infinite doesn't exist is too narrow minded for a scientist- we are restricted by our present understanding.

  • - 'the universe is possibly infinite in extent' - don't be silly Brian, nothing in real life is infinite. Don't confuse mathematics with reality. Now carry on.....

  • Trying to explain physics to the french is like trying to teach them to use soap. Exhausting and pointless.

  • @SIRA063 Or it would create a black hole. Also the structure of atoms (protons, neutrons and electrons) are made up of quarks, it is actually the structure and numbers that these three things happen to take that decide what element is created, the quarks only form the matter that allows this to happen. Quarks cannot be elements as there would technically speaking only be 3 elements on the periodic table.

  • @SIRA063 Our sun would first shed it's outer layers frying the closest planets to it (mercury, venus, earth and mars) then collapse in on itself to form a white dwarf star, a very dense white glowing ball of iron, carbon (and helium undergoing fusion). a larger star (about 4 times the size of our sun) would collapse in on itself to produce either a neutron star (which consists mainly of neutrons, a cluster of neutrons the size of a full stop would weigh as much as 5 fully grown elephants).

  • Knowing how a star turns hydro to helium, and then to heavier stuff, what would happen if the sun collapsed in intself like... 5000 times. For argument sake pretend it happened instantly. Would it produce a super super heavy elemtn??? further more, elements/atoms, are the building blocks of objects. and the quarks are the building blocks of atoms, shouldnt those things be the elements?

  • @melese1988 teach me everyting about physics

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more