Soccer
Top Comments
All Comments (30)
-
@Darkony Not to mention plenty of kids who need to be adopted into responsible, loving households.
Only the elements saturated in religion in society are homophobic - tolerance, irrelevancy, and acceptance of non-heterosexuality is growing. Over 70% of this upcoming generation alone accepts homosexuality to be normal - within three generations homophobia will be as prominent as racism, which isn't saying much. Take note that I'm not American. I am Canadian (we are more tolerant to the gays).
-
@Darkony Unbiased studies as in studies which are conducted to come to a fair conclusion, and not studies to enforce a desired conclusion.
You're right. This IS medicine - not politics. The only possible thing that could be accused against homosexuality is that the two partners cannot reproduce biologically (yet gay couples can still 'reproduce' via surrogacy or adoption), yet that is hardly a negative as the world is already overpopulated and lacking resources to support the global population.
-
"All unbiased studies"
So you now choose which studies to believe too ?!
This is medicine, not politics.
Gays are at a higher risk of several diseases.
The problem is, the American society is very homophobic, many regular small acts are considered gay, while in other countries are normal acts. Such thing caused increases homosexuality, there is almost no room to like a person of the same sex without being called homosexual.
The more you suppress, the bigger the explosion !
-
@bachmann4president No response? Hilarious.
-
@Darkony "Just ask a doctor about the danger of being homosexual. Gays are at very higher risk of fatal diseases, especially STDs"
That is a blatant falsehood promoted by religious institutions such as the American evangelical fundamentalist, "Family Research Council". All unbiased studies dictate that sexual risk is on par with heterosexuality, and depends on the tolerance of the local area - the more intolerant the area the more the risk, while tolerance bring much less risk.
-
@Darkony Bisexuality is not "animalistic"; it is a separate orientation that is as authentic as heterosexuality and homosexuality. There is the perception that bisexuals are prone to be more promiscuous, but this perception is produced by the media for entertainment in lieu of sturdy scientific surveys.
-
@Darkony We should keep religion in mind in this discussion, as it is your prime motive for being against non-heterosexuality.
Humor me for a second: if your religion dictated that eating an apple was a grave sin, but all science dictated that apples are not only "safe" to eat, but good for you, would you still be against it by virtue of blind piety? Or would you do the rational thing and consider not the apple but the religion imposing irrational perceptions upon you?
-
@Darkony Call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure that the sperm of homosexuals still work, so if by magic all heterosexuals (and bisexuals) vanished leaving homosexuals behind, I'm pretty sure that a male "homo" will take one for the team and sleep with a lesbian in order for the human race to reproduce biologically. Take note that scans of homosexual brains revealed them to be of a different structure in some parts, giving precedent to homosexuality not being psychological.
-
Forget religion for a second,
Asexuality can be caused biologically, well-known.
But Homo & Bi are not. They are psychological.
Imagine, if heterosexuality extincted. How much time would it take for the human race to extinct ? less the 1 lone century.
Bisexuality is just animalistic & is a whole other story.
Just ask a doctor about the danger of being homosexual. Gays are at very higher risk of fatal diseases, especially STDs.
It is just not right.
Oh please, ignorant people will feel tension or awkward. Kudos to this guys for coming out
k4th4rt1cSTATE 3 months ago 14
@ccrimsonfox excuse me?, but not every gay man is into any other man
SuperIdelfonso 3 months ago 9