Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Joe Stiglitz: "Gun at our Heads"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,551
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 20, 2008

Stiglitz talking about the Wall Street "bailout"

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (madashelldude)

  • Great Vid, but infinite regulations cannot solve the problem. The harshest regulator is the threat of going out of business. The attempts at regulation are the very reason banks become too big to fail. Banks have been permitted and encouraged to gamble with the publics money, under the guise of regulation, so they're going to take lots of risk. There will always be some way to bypass regulation. If they faced a risk of bankruptcy, they'd regulate themselves.

  • Eliot Spitzer agrees with you. He thinks there were enough regulations in place it's just the Bush administration didn't enforce them. I happen to agree with much of that because derivatives are also capable to raise good overnight loans for venture capital and high tech investments. They were used in the 90s. On the other hand I think having 30% of our econ dedicated to the plumbing of capitalism ie. finance is a bit excessive. 5% sounds much better.

  • Stiglitz is who Obama should have picked as his top economic advisor....he gets it. We can only hope the Larry Summers and Tim Geitner's of the world have learned from their mistakes.

  • Unfortunately Obama's hands are tied until Ben Barnanke's term expires, ie. 1 more year. I think until then Wall Street is dictating a lot of what's happening in the background. We know what happens to politicians who step out of line: just look at Spitzer and Blagojevich.

Top Comments

  • Excellent, everyone should see this. Thank you for posting this.

see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @myheadhurtsnow

    The threat of going out of business and tougher regulation aren't mutually exclusive.

    Also if regulation is in place in regards to the maximum size allowed for a financial institution (in many countries there is a ban of markets shares in excess of 25% or even less), the probability of receiving a bailout when going under will diminish and thereby reduce the willingness to gamble too much.

    Letting no-one think they are invaluable will limit risk-taking.

  • You ARE NOT defending Spitzer and Blago!! OMG-You're a conspiracy theorist! God flippin' help us.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more