Richard Dawkins' Ultimate Excuse for Not Debating!
Loading...
835
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (Birdieupon)
Top Comments
-
It's so hard to avoid personal attacks on Dawkins, because he's just so objectively weasel-like.
-
Nope!
see all
All Comments (35)
-
The inherent implication there is that Craig's views are the intellectual equivalent of a person believing in a flat earth. The problem there is that the debate was not to be about science, but the existence or non-existence of God. So even if Craig was a Creationist, believed in a flat earth, geocentrism, alchemy, and whatever else, that is merely a digression on your and Dawkins' part.
-
Like who?
-
@Birdieupon Hey, I don't care about the outcome of whether he wins or loses a debate, I'd just like to see him man up and debate somebody that he is always chickening out on.
Loading...
The Ohio State Michigan football rivalry isn't as energetic about meetings as the Craig supporters are to see a debate.
It's almost like one side needs the debate to validate themselves......hmm......
imperator332 3 months ago
@imperator332
"It's almost like one side needs the debate to validate themselves......hmm......"
Surely better than chickening out to validate oneself, wouldn't you agree?
Birdieupon 2 months ago
@Birdieupon
I'm sorry, I'd have responded sooner, but I had to debate someone who thinks the Earth is flat. Better than "chickening out" I suppose....
imperator332 2 months ago
@imperator332
" I had to debate someone who thinks the Earth is flat. Better than "chickening out" I suppose...."
Then why does Dawkins choose to debate some "flat earthers" and not others?
Birdieupon 2 months ago