Modern Human NOT from Africa

Out of africa theory debunked by chinese. all modern human races did NOT originate in Africa, and black africans did not "turn into" the other races 40,000 years ago as the UN backed afrocentric lies propose.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• out of africa
• theory
• evolution
• pre human
• ancestor
• cro magnon
• neanderthal
• nibiru
• black
• white
• human
• sapiens
• anunnaki
• race
• racial
• ethnicity

[bucksmasher1]

The chinese just don't want to admit that they have black ancestors.

[ritchloui]

@DisprovingEvolution The idiotic claims against evolution are just that, idiotic. It is NOT scientific to stick to magic as an explanation. The creatarts have no hesitation in lying, quote mining and generally being assholes in defense of their 'magic' non-explanation. THIS is why it is fair to say that religion has been THE major stumbling block to Man's understanding and development for the last 2,000 years. Enough is enough.

[MrNodzilla]

I wonder if the jaw bones simmering in a pan of soup yet,those Chinks will eat anything!

[MartinJWillett]

People who assume that there is a fundamental distinction between a recent African universal common ancestor and multi-regional human evolution simply don't understand what it means to be a universal common ancestor. It is not inconsistent for Chinese people to be descended from ancient hominids in Asia AND to have a shared universal common human ancestor on both the pure male and pure female line. Most of everybody's ancestors are on mixed sex lines of descent. Think people, think!

[birenp89]

hahahahahahaha dr. chin chong chu

[AmeriProud67]

There still is a common ancestor in Africa. The timing of when various people developed will always be in question, but the first humans all go back to Africa ultimately.

[gregrutz]

< "turn into" the other races 40,000 years ago . I think 40,000 years is a little short.

.

''members of one branch of Homo sapiens left Africa by between 125,000 and 60,000 years ago, and that over time these humans replaced earlier human populations such as Neanderthals and Homo erectus.[4]'' Wikipedia

[MedjayCommander]

@TheEqualizer2U What DNA proved what cover up in Egypt?

What you mean that screen shot that has been debunked, LOL trust us we will not stop you from buying the DNA kit offered by that company so it can tell you, you are related to an Indigenous African king. If you have seen pictures of Tuts parents, grand parents, plus his Sickle Cell related death and still think he was European, you go right a head and spend that few hundred dollars.

[MedjayCommander]

"You need to keep in mind that 'Homo sapiens' for most Chinese scholars is not limited to anatomically modern humans," he says. "For many of them, it is all 'post Homo erectus,' humans."

(cont)

Chris Stringer of London's Natural History Museum said that it was too early to make far-reaching conclusions. "From the parts preserved, this fossil could just as likely be related to preceding archaic humans, or even to the Neanderthals, who at times seem to have extended their range towards China."

[MedjayCommander]

What exactly debunked the Out Of Africa fact? Because if I'm not mistaken there has not been an ounce of information on this so-called major find, since this news broadcast was aired in 2009. And you have seemed to have not read these important statements.

Others disagreed. Erik Trinkaus, an anthropologist at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, questioned whether the find was a true Homo sapiens. (cont)