Boost Logic Supra vs GN
Top Comments
All Comments (74)
-
wonder why the gns and turbo trans ams never got the publicity that the
riceburner supra did.
esp. when the gn had a stronger, more tunable engine, made more torque,
made more HP per Dollar, and costs less,
(3.8 turbo 6 LC2 >> 3.0 turbo 6 2-Junk-z <-------gotta love that torquey PUSHROD V6)
and looks much better.
and that the fastest GN's/TTAs are FASTER than the fastest Supra's.
Supras are overrated riceburners. GNs and Turbo Trans Ams are FAR better
-
@50908 well it didnt modd for modd so.... doesnt matter if he let off their was no return
-
Both beautiful cars would love to own em both
-
@crazyviolent69 I'm sorry but it looks like the GN let off 1/8th mile.. you sir have no idea what you are saying!
-
@VTsavalas you can see it at the start he didnt have a good run
-
It'ed be closer than you think. Stock Supra's aren't any faster than an LS1 F-body, which means mid 13's. The GNX, in the rare event you'ed actually meet up with one at a light concidering there are only 547 of em some of which didn't make it over the passed 25 years, ran just that, mid 13's. Lord have mercy if a stock supra ever came up against an 89 TTA pace car. It'ed get its clock cleaned.
-
@cristianrulez2 I know this comment is a year old, but lets bare in mind not all LC2 equipped cars are GNX'es either. :) This was a standard Grand National.
-
@1985TA355 A: that's not a gnx. B: a stock gnx vs a stock supra, the supra would win. C: you need to do some research before you go assuming based on your opinions. I love the grand nationals just as much as i do supra's, it's v6 vs s6, twin turbo vs single turbo!
-
547 actually
stock for stock the '87 Buick GNX would outrun a supra
1985TA355 3 years ago 5
first off the supra was not stock...and all gnx's are v6
cristianrulez2 2 years ago 4