A Scientific Debate on Race and Intelligence Part 9 of 11
Uploader Comments (EgalitarianJay)
All Comments (29)
-
Why they only talk about blacks. I don't get it. Lots of mongoloid asiatics are pretty much anti-white. I don;t get it it's brainwashing to spread their communism again and keep blacks low also.
-
Do you want me to give you examples of shit hole Caucasian places? India for example!! Then Somali, then in Eastern Europe, Bosnia, Croatia, mostly former USSR, and don't tell me communism caused that, because before communism they were not as developed as people thought, the list can go on and on. A racist sees everything he wants to see!! Talk about violence and crime, study Hitler's Aryan race theory and tell me 65 million people died by the hands of savage blacks!
-
@FIGHTFANNERD3 Black crime rates are higher according to what source? The FBI has a statistical methodology you may wanna look at. Also see Cold Case Files...Almanac Book of facts 2011, pg 127 to 132 FBI's Uniform Crime Reports by race 70% distribution for whites(Not including corporate crimes). However, the methodology will tell you that statistics aren't remotely reliable enough, if well comprehended....More whites should be in prison but they're not
-
This white man is racist bigot and he is crazy and well insane totally far far in a worldo of make believe. how could he say that slavery had no effect on blacks and continue to.. I guess u must have to live in his mind.. totally insane.. even the indians .. my my .. my.
-
In response to the 100 of each race question the 2nd white guy is fighting strawmen. Noone stipulated that in sorting them out you can only use one variable (he names skin colour). You can use a set of variables eg. skin colour, hair texture, skull length, nasal opening etc. I feel he is being disingenuous in his answer to that audience question.
-
Why does the white bespectacled guy only consider one single trait when evaluating the capacity to categorise? One trait is certainly not enough but why not just expand the pool of criteria?
-
@andrzejewski1960 Rushton was out-numbered indeed
but the science today proves Rushton right anyway this video is old
-
@EgalitarianJay people travel to the Bahamas thats why
Dr. Graves seemed somewhat belligerent and aggressive. The blks in the audience responded to that by laughing and signifying as they do in blk churches. More evidence that Rushton is obviously correct.
If I were in the debate I would have presented my home town of Detroit as evidence. When Detroit was 90% white it was great. Now that it is 90% blk, shit hole just like EVERY other blk city in the world BAR NONE.
Rushton was out-numbered 3 to one and he sill won the debate. LOL
andrzejewski1960 11 months ago 4
@andrzejewski1960 There are some nice majority Black cities in the Caribbean such as Nassau, Bahamas. Graves may have been emotional and had some cheerleaders in the crowd but I believe his arguments were solid and Rushton looked noticeably frustrated in the debate. Graves had a retort for every argument Rushton made and Rushton self-destructed in the debate with his sophistry about White atrocities being part of human nature and no races being more savage than another.
EgalitarianJay 10 months ago 6
@EgalitarianJay Graves didn't explain why the numerous variables listed by Rushton group into three taxa. That seems to be a feature of the data that requires explaining.
PiotrThePrimate 1 month ago
@PiotrThePrimate He didn't need to explain Rushton's numerous variables because he already explained why Rushton's evolutionary theory is wrong. His other data is inadequate for supporting his theory and much of that data can be explained by environmental factors. Basically once the core assumptions of Rushton's theory have been falsified the extra data he compiled can be dismissed as evidence supporting the theory.
EgalitarianJay 2 weeks ago