STI vs CTS-V

mods are in the video, enjoy.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Cadillac
• CTS-V
• STI
• subaru
• LS6
• LS1

[thunderup86]

as I walk through the valley of the shadow of rice. I will fear no turbo because displacement is always with me.

[adanieljohnson1]

lol, very nice! I always love when we get more racing vids posted up on youtube...

[anonymzs]

lmao try that from a dig.

[STIRKDAWG]

@2wheelsbeatsanything WILL DO.

[johntvette]

@2wheelsbeatsanything Same car in rwd configuration would have been faster. When was the last time you saw an AWD F1 car? Or a GT car for that matter? Go to any regional race track and watch the classes......The AWD cars are in the slower classes. AWD has a very low ceiling on dry pavement.

[2wheelsbeatsanything]

@johntvette This article isn't about the cars in this vid, as I couldn't find any factory track times to compare, but I think it responds to your statement: Youtube won't let me post the link for some reason but its Car and Driver's article titled "2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI Sets Nurburgring Lap Record"

-I understand its not an official production car but how does this Subaru, which has a lower power-to-weight ratio, go faster than the Cadillac? Maybe its AWD system??

[2wheelsbeatsanything]

@STIRKDAWG It's in NC, TN, and GA..p.s. "next time you have a thought, let it go"

[johntvette]

@2wheelsbeatsanything I agree with your name btw....If it can't wheelie, it sucks.

[johntvette]

@2wheelsbeatsanything On dry pavement, the CTS-V will do better. Rear wheel drive is the fast way around a dry track. Period.

[johntvette]

@starling73779 It's supposed to prove which CAR is faster, not which DRIVER is better.

[SCRex0472]

No racing from a dig...that's what I thought. Both nice cars.

[canuckaholic91]

@chapmanmerchant it was probably 340hp, but still got spanked since that cts-v has that 550hp powerplant D: