Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The CIT Deception - pt. 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,758
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 21, 2010

The CIT Deception - The Plane, The Path, The Poles, The Pentagon

A detailed account of Citizen Investigation Team's manipulation of the evidence relating to the Pentagon on 9/11.

  • likes, 28 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (brokenstyx)

  • YOU DEBUNK NOTHING!

    PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH'S FINDINGS, BACK UP CIT'S FINDINGS.

    DEBUNK 7/7 YOU ENGLISH AZZHOLE!....CRAIG RANKE AND ALDO ARE CORRECT!

  • @WymeWruscel

    When everyone saw the plane hit the pentagon, what does it matter what PfT say?

    I like how craig and aldo got many witnesses to say on camera that they saw the plane hit the pentagon. good work there guys.

  • @brokenstyx The CIT witnessess say the plane was on the NORTH side of the citgo and that it "GUNNED" the engines and the plan tilted UP! None of them were in a position to SEE THE IMPACT! They admit to that! Now watch the PILOTS for 9/11 truth video and they find that the ALTIMETER was not RESET on decent into the Pentagon, rendering the plane 400 feet above the official version. THAT PUTS THE PLANE OVER THE PENTAGON...That information is supplied by the FAA Black box data. WATCH IT AND LEARN.

  • @WymeWruscel

    Given that all witnesses saw the plane hit the pentagon, not fly over, which witnesses do you say are credible north-side witnesses? We can go one by one. Try to calm down and relax a little and you will get through this. More posts about 25 different points with a 500character limit full of capitals and rage don't ingratiate you to people who might read these discussions in the future.

  • The sentence at 2:57 is false. He specifically points out the "do not enter" sign that is far from lightpole #1.

  • @beauxq

    no he doesn't.

Top Comments

  • You are right Truthstorm this video itself is disinformation. CIT has done well and this video stinks of screw loose change or JREF disinformation.

  • CIT did an excellent thorough job. I see numerous holes in your logic and deceptions in your presentation. I have been through this material front to back. I would be happy to respond in detail on 911blogger however after 3 attempts to reach the board admins they are missing in action or ignoring me completely and my posts do not appear although I can still up and down vote posts. My name on blogger is atomicbomb.

see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @brokenstyx All CIT witnesses CONFIRM the NORTHSIDE FLYOVER as do PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH'S analysis of the FAA data! You are showing you ignorance, stick to the facts not the personal attacks. Watch the presentations from PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH...and PAY ATTENTION long enough to absorb the material. AND NOBODY SHOULD EVER STOP BEING ANGRY ABOUT GOVERNMENT DECPETION! THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF 9/11 WAS SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSBLE, FOR EVERY FLIGHT! DO YOUR RESEARCH! AND I CAN CARE LESS ABOUT DISCUSSIONS!

  • Craig Ranke is a liar and deceiver. "National Security Alert" is a total fraud and disinformation.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more