John Coleman slams global warming (1 of 4)

Well once again we prove that AGW Jihadists have no facts to back up their AGW theory. AGW is still a media generated myth, created for the ignorant populace that lick it up like milk starved kittens. They fell for "IDA The missing link found" scam with the same fervor as the AGW myth. They are blinded by an extreme hatred for mankind, and that is only the reflection of the extreme hatred they have for themselves. The Hitler Youth once again join the chorus in the extermination of millions.

BS = Coleman

You can debunk Coleman all you want, but the evidence that defies "global warming" is abundant. Couple that with evidence that scientific groups globally backed by political organizations have been caught doctoring research results in an attempt to promote fear of "global warming" and there is a clear picture to be seen. Groups with dubious aims are trying to influence public belief. It's prudent to be mindful of the environment, but being mindful doesn't require manipulation and control.

Wrong
Rely on the experts.
Google... Scientific Opinion on Climate Change Wikipedia

There is no credible debate in the scientific community. No wanting to believe doesn't overcome the many studies.

FMI... UCSUSA(dot)org

One thing about research you learn early, always analyze their credibility.

Sources that are NOT credible aren't worth your time unless you're a scientist and want to pick apart the argument. For those of us laymen we couldn't possibly grasp this incredibly complex science sufficiently.

But the question for you is why do you feel it necessary to gravitate to Coleman, the guy with no study, and away from respected institutions? AAAS, SOCC, NASA, EPA, AGU, AIP, AMS, ... ??

Denial?

just trying to help? what the hell does that mean? if you actually watched the video i gave you the link, which i highly doubt you did, how is it that he is incorrect? you tell me right here and now. how is he incorrect?

Why watch the vid? Again, Coleman is not a credible source. I'll email you a debunking of his statements. They are far too long for this blog.

But, if you find a source that you think is credible please send me a link. I'd love to review it.

There are many originating from vested interests like CATO and The Heartland Institute. They can fool the gullible layman. The best advise is to stick with our well known reliable institutions.
AAAS, SOCC, NASA, EPA, AGU, AIP, AMS, NCAR, NAS, and others.

Good luck

Coleman is NOT a credible source.
He is NOT a climatologist and he doesn't have a study to back up his claims.

There is no credible doubt in the scientific community that studies global warming. ALL our historically reliable scientific institutions concur on the core issue; HUMANS are warming the planet and the consequences are not good.

Google
Scientific Opinion on Climate Change Wiki

FMI... UCSUSA(dot)org

you're being sarcastic right, lol?