Wobblies and Zapatistas Part 1
Top Comments
All Comments (18)
-
Occupy Wall Street defined
-
@RJMooreII No, feudalism is called feudalism and not anarchy for a reason. Feudalism is practically hierarchal by definition.
-
@CapitalismIsLiberty U mad?
-
While I agree with you that these left-anarchists are problematic for reasons of their anti-market leanings, they are not 'communists' in the Stalinist sense, the Zapatistas do have an effective counter-state community. Just because they're violent or do bad things isn't the same as being Statist. Feudal europe had no state, and could be called anarchy, but it was certainly not anarcho-capitalist (though closer than you might think in some ways).
-
the Zapatistas are just a bunch of communist TERRORISTS! the mexican government should have crushed them when they had the chance. as for the IWW, they were just fake anarchists who wanted to create a monopoly on the sale of labor. if you get rid of the state, then we will have true capitalism (not the kind of corporatism we have now.)
-
Thank you for the upload, Im buying this book asap
-
Buddhagem..
you believe in wage slavery?
aww..
~Anarchist-w/out-adj
-
We'll miss you this semester Andrej!
"para todos todo, para nosotros nada!"
-
I just assumed that because you asked the question, you believed that he was a Crimethinc-er. Apologies.
I've briefly skimmed through the essay, but I'll give it a thorough read-over. Thanks
I love it when anarchists get involved in labour movements, and encourage others to do so. We need to get back to the time when anarchists were dynamic even in the big unions. The fact he's speaking in New York recalls Emma Goldman, one of the greatest trade unionists and one of the most important anarchist theorists ever.
wid85 2 years ago 4
I'm taking a class from that book taught by Grubacic now. great stuff.
spartan2600 2 years ago 3