Everyone has a right to their own opinion...

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,011
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 27, 2007

A response to a trenchant comment by debunkthejunk

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (23456D)

  • am i the only one that thinks that the entier thing is just too stupid to not to be ment to raise this theories? i mean all the footage all the seen things for me sugests that everything is so oviouse to what it actualy was that the coverup made actualy calls in for private investigations like loose change.

  • Roman, yes, I've thought this too.

  • "steel"

  • I'm not sure, but to say that it could happen without bombs seems to me to pretty well confirm that it could also happen with bombs. And when you look at all of the evidence, it is more consistant with bombs than the theories created by NIST. And whether it was bombs or not, the possibility should have been investigated, just in case, you know? Why wasn't the possibility ever considered? How were they so sure from the moment it happened?

see all

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Its common sense, even if something is a crime scene, first responders have to do whatever it takes to save human life. If that means trampling evedence, so be it. If it turned out somebody could have been saved and they didnt because of 'evedence', people like you would bitch endlessly about it. Furthermore, terrorism is an act of WAR not an act of crime. There is different protocol. I think they handled it right, if they didn't, there's good reason.

  • that's interesting. who told you that?

  • This is assinine. You are incredibly arrogant. Everybody saw the planes crash, thats why the terrorist conclusion was drawn and their first concern was finding possible survivors, this superceded any 'crime scene' investigation columbo.

  • You are talking about the ommission report aren't you dog? Sylvestor

  • I tried to post a congrats and a response on your other video but it didn't work? I assume this one will so congrats and nice to see yah again. Many happy years to you both. peace bro.

  • Everyone has the right to their opinion, it just doesn't have any value...

    The truth does not change by voting on it...

    Get some evidence, then hypothesize, get some confirmation, then create a theory. Don't just make shit up.

  • there's a funny saying that you take out a pain with a bigger pain. for what i think is that the "bombs" were made to cover the charge detonations. cuz you need a hell of a blast to knock out the main colums so that no remain stands vertical. we are talking here about the main resistance core made specificaly for holding everything.

  • this is actualy what awake this thought in me that is actualy a beacon to take the atention for a long time away from something.but is just a theory i have that may or not be true.

  • in my opinion the actual truth can't be behind wtc. yea was a big tragedy yea the buildings were demolished, i trully beleve that all was made to mask something.

    i say all this because you don;t have to be an expert to actualy understand what happend. adding to that is the bbc thing in witch they report building 7 collapsed while they film-it standing.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more