Suez 1956 : Story of struggling against colonialism - p(1/2)
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (109)
-
@TheLiberalKnight Militarily Britain was not defeated no.
-
@iraqiblaze That's fair enough. But I was responding to idiots on here who seem to think the British army was defeated by the Egyptians.
-
@TheLiberalKnight Nasir defeated the British politically. He gained larger international sympathy while Britain and France became more internationally isolated. Britain's status as an international power was ended when they backed down when the US told them to. As I said, this was a political victory.
-
I know this is irrelevant. But Anthony Eden reminds me of Mike Myers in Austen Powers
-
Britain militarily crushed the Egyptians in Suez. This idea that Nassar defeated the British is a fuckin JOKE. The British army killed 1000 Egyptians at a loss of only one man at Suez. Militarily Suez was completely under British control. It was only thanks to the Americans and their economic tyranny that Britain was forced to retreat. Eisenhower was a stupid, inexperienced mong!
-
@dmax631 Uhh the U.S. did NEVER ANYTHING TO VIETNAM. So what money did the U.S. got in Vietnam? Nothing. Nothing imperalist for the U.S. there in Vietnam so you're wrong. If they did, they would have won Vietnam ages ago and coneur through China.
-
@JuanMacready yaa and so did Bush and Blair you asshole.
-
@dmax631 It's called Politics they fuck us up.
-
The Americans opposed the British as imperialist, yet just one decade later they were doing exactly the same thing in vietnam
-
@RichardElden Sigh, have a good life. I don't have time to deal with nonsense.
Creation of Israel is a plan to take over Mecca and Medina. If you don't believe me then look up plans of greater Israel.
Exposingantiahmadiya 1 year ago 3
@Aurileus5 Eden did the right thing.
JuanMacready 1 year ago 3