Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (349)
-
@IlGattonero13 Of course, the way of processing accepted depends on the character or intention of the piece. So, I'm talking about the composition, not the performer. It's good he had done this, so we can reflect, discuss and refresh our ears. Blessings. = ]
-
@IlGattonero13 It's true about his ability. But I think, and you might disagree with me, that's fine: the composition itself tells you the kind of speed it requires in relation to the amount of sound relationships or events the mind has to process. Yes, true that this is only a *2 part* invention, but you can still perceive the huge flow of activity like a power hose. That doesn't tell me of facileness and speed, however abilities at hand. Momentum: if you pass it, yo trade value for waste.
-
I NEED AN ANALYSIS ON THIS FOR MY FRIEND WHO STUDY MUSIC, THANKS
-
perfect crystal clear... master ... but too fast... when you slow tempo the song shows itself as a delicate piece.
-
What a remarkable performance.
So fast, but so precise and every note having a purpose.
Wonderful interpretation.
-
mark the striking resemblance between this and handels allegro from the suite in g.
-
You can listen to this slow whenever your want. But Glenn Gould is the only one who can give you the chance to hear it in 45 seconds.
-
for me is too much speed. It´s perfect the performance but the beautiful cannon is lost in the speed.
-
Das Tempo des Spiels ist ziemlich ungewoenlich, in solchem Tempo hoere ich diese Invention zum 1sten Mal, gewoehnlich spielt man sie etwas langsamer. Solche Geschwindigkeit ist aber eine gute originelle Loesung von Herrn Gould, meine ich!
-
Bach + Gould = perfect combination
i had a dream it was bach's birthday and i had to babysit all of his kids :( :(
chezlesetoiles 5 months ago 40
Correct tempi are not absolute. Gould made it work at this speed because every note was crystal clear, the voices were perfectly balanced, and every phrase sang. He was a wonder.
IlGattonero13 7 months ago 29