Le Nozze di Figaro-Crudel! Perche Finora
Top Comments
All Comments (53)
-
canto complessivamente di buon livello, interpretazione pessima, soprattutto mai vista una Susanna tanto inespressiva
-
Didn't like this version. The acting is could and slow. Despite Netrebko's beauty, I prefer the version interpreted by Cecilia Bartoli (not so beautiful) as Susanna, found here on YouTube, too.
-
@JericClage Which is what I meant, but my mind was a bit twisted up! ;)
-
@ElisabettaVS Rosina is the countess ... Obviously, Anna is singing Susanna ...
-
Beide sind so langweilig, aber er hat eine besonders nichtssagende Stimme und Ausstrahlung.
-
What an awful version of this. The acting and singing is making me cringe. And so slow!!! Thomas Allen and Peter Mattei do it so much better!
-
SNORE! This interpretation is horrible, and the staging is AWFUL. I also watched the first scene of the first act with the same people and it was BAD. Why the heck would the whole opera take place in a freaking stairway? Why does the Count look like Frankenstein? Why do they make out at the end of the scene? She doesn't like the guy. Do they know what they're singing about? Why is it so sloooow. Nothing like the same scene interpreted by Miah Persson and Gerald Finlay, also on youtube
-
He has such a boring voice, which is really hard to hear anyway.
-
Netrebko is not my favourite Rosina, a little too dark for that role....
-
Hm, interesting concept. Nothing light and enyoable in this interpretation. Lots of passion though. I like it.
I totally agree with you!
firtuli 2 years ago 3
You are so right, the acting is outstanding, how she not only sings beautifully but really uses the grips the words to express herself , goes for all the singers in this free flying prod.
linding68 2 years ago 3