Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Julius Caesar (Battles B.C.) 1/4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,648
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Oct 31, 2010

In 52 BC another, larger revolt erupted in Gaul, led by Vercingetorix. Vercingetorix managed to unite the Gallic tribes and proved an astute commander, defeating Caesar in several engagements, but Caesar's elaborate siege-works at the Battle of Alesia finally forced his surrender.[46] Despite scattered outbreaks of warfare the following year, Gaul was effectively conquered. Plutarch claimed that the army had fought against three million men in the course of the Gallic Wars, of whom 1 million died, and another million were enslaved. 300 tribes were subjugated and 800 cities were destroyed. However, in view of the difficulty in finding accurate counts in the first place, Caesar's propagandistic purposes, and the common gross exaggeration of numbers in ancient texts, the totals of enemy combatants in particular are likely to be too high.


JULIUS CAESAR ROMAN GENERAL ROME GAUL GAULE ALESIA DIJON VERCINGETORIX GALLIC TRIBES BATTLE SIEGE GAULOIS

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SPARTANsenator7)

  • I think the only reason Caesar's death is a tragedy is that it didn't occur sooner.

  • @evolooshion

    I disagree, assasinating Caesar was againt Rome's interests!

  • @SPARTANsenator7 I agree with you there, but I have...less than favorable things to say about Rome. Perhaps I'm odd in that sense

  • @evolooshion

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion buddy :) In a way i agree with you too!

Top Comments

  • I just don't see Caesar as a brutal slaughterng butcher. He was a general of HIS TIME....not of OUR TIME. Any other military leader of the time would have done the same thing. We should not apply our moral standards on historical figurres. I'm not supporting the old Roman empire. Just saying Caesar was a man of his time...not ours. They had different moral standards back then.

  • @dvashnik

    Too bad he failed to see the treason within Brutus! Caesar did not deserve that kind of death!

see all

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @AstiArts

    true!

  • @SPARTANsenator7 yes Alexander The Great Was a far more superior and intelligent conquerer and king than caesar he did it all in 33 Years!

  • @LaserBeam002 That being said even the Romans had lower moral satandards than most other peoples in ancient Europe in my opinion

  • @crocgator44

    provided that the salad is not tainted :)

  • I just dont see Caesar as a brutal slaughter.. .when hes on my pizza box 's

  • The Gallic Wars proved that not only does caesar destryo armies but the will to continue also

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more