Atheism/Theism the great debate
Uploader Comments (schmatt13)
All Comments (12)
-
Atheism/Theism the great debate? More like Troll Warz if you ask me. I realize that atheism is supposed to be a non position or a negative assertion but why have you spent so much time talking about the obvious creationists fails? wtf? If you would like to watch one the does not fail try: Scientific Proof of God by simpletoremember. It does not really prove anything but it is interesting and way to long.
-
Might want to hit the books again.
-
Excellent video. It makes so much sense, as most of us here know. It's unfortunate that it will be lost on most Theists.
-
wow..
It's not our place to disprove but your place to prove, since U R making the claim!
A "god" as a creative force may exist, but it's my position that it's not your Xian god. If U say your Xian god is/was real, then prove it, or provide some tangible evidence! I doubt seriously that U can.
I will happily debate U on any aspect of scripture or Xianity, as that is my favorite subject to challenge.
What do you say?
-
No, you're mistaken, you can't disprove God, any athiest will happily admit that to you. You can however, quite easily falsify the vast majority of the claims of religion. Claims, in christianity, like the creation, the great flood, the age of the earth, the genesis of mankind and even the accounts of Jesus' life. I realise that these are literal interpretations, but they are infact the only thing that seperates the individual religions.
I am open minded, therefore I am a
Christian. I study history and philosophy, therefore I am a Christian. I study science, therefore, I am a Christian.
ignati123 2 years ago
I would redoubled your efforts in all the above areas.
schmatt13 2 years ago
Sorry, I didn't mean to delete your previous comment I hit it by accident when I went to reply. Even if we can concieve of an eternal, pre-existent singularity, it doesn't mean that there is any evidence to suggest such a thing actually exists. And science doesn't know everything either, we're all well aware of that, but just because we haven't found all the anwers it doesn't warrant us making up our own answers in the mean time. I'm not proud, just punctilious with the truth.
schmatt13 2 years ago
Science however, can give us many answers, reasonably, realistic, empirically demonstrable answers to many questions that once eluded us. I'm more interested in what I can discern to be true, despite what I may want to believe, I am unable to accept supernatural claims that are almost exclusively made on the reasoning of plausibe doubt, not on facts. Furthermore, I think it's demonstrably dangerous to make up our own unqualified half-truths. Not having an answer isn't a crime.
schmatt13 2 years ago