12th Comm' On 9/11 TV Fakery - Newtons Law

Newtons law or how to accelerate a tower.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• TV
• video
• fakery
• no
• plane
• hologram
• simonshack
• ozzybanoswald
• webfairy
• bsregistration
• september
• clues
• octopus
• south
• tower
• impact
• UA175
• WTC
• terror
• bush
• airplane
• accident
• hijack

[jesudel]

who are your plane witnesses, those computer degenerated people we all can see in some videos? or the witnesses who talked about a little plane? or the witnesses who said i saw something i don't know what it is? or the one who told i saw a cesna?

make poetry...

that's all man. bye, bye.

[achimspok]

bye bye

[danawanapskana]

This whole things appears to be made from software. I have seen analysis of this video and shall look to see if can find it again. It has been a few years. The mirror image is off, the buildings have digital problems, the smoke is looped and unrealistic, the plane is not effective against realistic analysis though I do not recollect distinctly at this time analysis of its sounds. There was indeed available computer programs which simulated buildings which match up against this possibility.

[73849309378]

Well if it was a missile it probably would have swung too. So what is your point?

[mikebeange]

@danawanapskana It's very possible for planes that big to fly that fast that low! Youtube is full of videos proving it so do some research instead of quoting all those stupid no-planers like Morgan Reynolds

[FreedumbFighter28]

No planers are morons....

There stupid fucking morons who will believe ANYTHING. Its no wonder they fell for 911 in the first place. They fell for Ace Bakers lies and Simon Shacks quit edits....and now they have the nerve to fight there own because there precious theory has been debunked over and over again. If you are a no planer....kill yourself.

Love

28

[drifter402]

@73849309378 i dont think it would.

[ratoig]

Idiotic, waste of time........... Who has said anything about holograms anyway.....

The explosion caused the building to sway. High winds do the same. So what??

[74pbg]

@dumbnetworks you do not think that any normal building would sway when hit by a Boing 767? This is normal, even the wind bring it to sway! And for those who think the camera is moving, look at the north tower doesn't sway!

[danawanapskana]

Secondly, it would not require a plane to make a building swing one direction or the next. The plane itself would not have been capable of traveling at this speed in this altitude range without breaking apart (but the plane is not a commercial jetliner anyway if you see the still images of it). I wonder if the aggressive wavelength display is intended to obscure some facet of the digital flaws, what the purpose of the strange overlaying 4x effect is (or does it just look unnatural more there)

[TheHMD93]

@keendreamer Most man made structures do not made rigid because they are not meant to be. Instead they are allowed to "bend" and shift. Alot of bridges naturally "bounce" due tot he tension caused by its own weight

[danawanapskana]

what is this supposed to prove? it feels as if i am being fed some evil lie. i don't like it for any forensic value at all except perhaps to a video experts professional analysis on this subject of fakery.

[dumbnetworks]

@keendreamer usually the simplest answer is the right one