In this clip, I very briefly explain why Steve Gregg's interpretation of Romans 9:20, a key passage in the Calvinist/Arminian controversy, is incorrect: it breaks the flow of the passage (specifically it does not connect with the immediately following "Potter/Clay" example) and it fails to appreciate the Scriptural usage of "Who art thou" as a rhetorical device in Scripture, including the usage by Paul later in the same epistle.
All Comments