Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

FC A.S. Violates the Law Feb 5, 2008 part SIX

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
759 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 24, 2008

Fullerton College Associated Students break the law by voting to throw out videographer/reporter DanaRose Crystal. The vote was illegal, and would have been overturned, had it been challenged in California Superior Court--due to direct violation of the Brown Act ( which was detailed in a Hornet newspaper report in the February 20, 2008 issue), and the negligence in not asking for abstentions. The vote would be nullified--had the AS not had the FC administration acting as their stooges. The VP interfered with my ability to defend and protect myself, effectively covering up for the AS' crimes and wrongdoings.

Ethan's calling for Campus Safety was a posturing and preening on his part, pretending to be a big shot in front of his sheep-senators. In fact, I wonder what would have happened had officer Jim McKamy arrived?

[ NOTE: I mispelled his name on the video as "McKinney" --it is McKamy ]

I wonder if Campus Safety is apprised of the laws? They ought to be, and I wonder if he would've refused to eject me, since there was no actual need to?

FC A.S. was acting in a fascist manner, and should NOT have been aided and abetted by the Vice President of Student Services, as it was, following this meeting. He was totally ignorant of the LAW, and HE violated my rights as press and public under the Brown Act, by barring my access to future A.S. meetings--as well as violating and interfering with my right to fight for my position within the A.S., since they had illegally removed me the week before, with violation of Robert's Rules of Order ( neglect to ask for abstentions ) and the right of elected officials to speak; in one case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that "the role that elected officials play in our society makes it all the more imperative that they be allowed freely to express themselves on matters of public importance." [ Wood v. Georgia, 370 U.S. 375, 394-95 (1962). ]

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

All Comments

Adding comments has been disabled for this video.

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more