Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

HONDA CRX vs Z06 Covette

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
11,221
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 12, 2007

HONDA CRX vs Z06 Covette

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • viva crx fuck zo6

  • Z06 wins with quite possibly the worst launch I've seen, ever.

see all

All Comments (55)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @mikethebeast1012 but if everyone just have v8s it would be a boring world to live in . variety is the spice of life!

  • @mikethebeast1012 ok so in your arguement you meant the camaro... the v6 camaro has 300 hp but 0-60 in 6.1 seconds and the 09 wrx for instance 0-60 in 5.1 seconds I am not argueing that jap cars are better or american cars are better... There is just no way that you V8 guys can say our numbers cant match yours. my daily driver is a 93 hatch with a jdm d15b in it 1.5 liter motor makes 130 hp and 0-60 in 7 sec a 96 gt mustang is a 4.6 and makes around 220 hp and 0-60 in 6.8??

  • @desertls1 True, the weight is all in the front. That is what the Z06 lacks. But if the engine was in the back the take will be better...

    Just saying

  • @mikethebeast2012

    I dont know where you got your figures from but the evo and wrx both make 280hp factory. That is the jap power limit. Both these cars can easily make over 320hp with factory turbo and exhausts. I own a nissan gtir and with thr only mod being a $10 boost tap i ran a 12.8 @ 112 Thats good performance for whats done if you ask me, not to mention i only paid 3 grand for the car!

  • granny driving the ZO6??

  • @paul22va i never mentioned a rustang, i used the camaro as an example. i agree power/weight yes ive heard the honda argument many times and its true but the weight difference is not as dramatic as you male it sound, on top of that the V8 Camaro even gets better highway fuel economy than both the EVO and STI, again the WRX cost is close to that of a V8 model with the STI costing even more, i have great respect for EVOs, STIs, but the fact is for the money you cannot match V8 performance stock

  • @mikethebeast1012 You keep saying numbers... what is the 0-60 on that v6 mustang?? about 5.6 when the wrx is about 4.8 ?? hmmm just cause the hp is higher doesnt mean anything man it is all about power to weight a car can have 1000 hp but if it weights 9999999999 pds its gonna be slow ha get what im saying

    of course a bigger motor is going to output higher hp out of the factory but if it isnt getting to the ground and down the road it doesnt mean shit

  • @paul22va i know exactly what im saying, i said for the price and that is the part you must have missed, the WRx makes like 265hp for $25k, where as the v6 Camaro makes over 300hp for $22k, and the EVO and STI cost more than $30k and make less power than the v6, the price of a base model v8 Camaro is $30k and it makes 426hp. so again as i said before no stock 4cyl can match v8 #s for the price

  • @mikethebeast1012 so no stock 4 cyl can get numbers like a v8 ?? what about the sti and evo?? or better yet the 09 and up wrx? you should make sure you know what you are talking about. honda no but subaru yes very possible

  • and obviously if you put a few thousand into the civic you could make it faster than the vette in 1/4 mile, but if you put the same amount of money into the vette and spend it on a supercharger, cams, ect., it would rape the crx..once again!

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more