The Evolution of Irreducible Complexity
Loading...
Uploaded by cdk007 on Mar 17, 2007
If we are to have a proper debate we all need to use the same definition of Irreducible Complexity. Michael Behe defines it as:
"By irreducibly complex I mean a single system composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning"
The problem is ID / creationist supporters take this to mean that an IC system could not have evolved. Their mistake is that IC is a statement about a systems present state, not its past history.
Many systems are by definition IC. But for every IC system studied data exists supporting a biologically plausible scenario for their evolution.
So in short, are their IC systems. Yes. Does being IC mean it could not have evolved. NO.
To download this video go to:
http://www.mediafire.com/?ctzb0mmttym
If you wish to translate this video you can download the PowerPoint file from:
http://www.mediafire.com/?4my3n4d4mgr
Learn the facts, spread the truth, and most importantly, Think About It.
Link to this comment:
Video Responses
76 videos
YouTube Mix for Rage Against the Machine
4:06Irreducible Complexity? Behe's Mousetrapby proudfootz11,330 views
- 1:22Disproving Atheists in 82 secondsby pamuk7398,467 views
- 7:27The Creationist Concept of Kindby cdk00728,098 views
- 7:21Emergence - Complexity from Simplicity, Order f...by theinquisitor26,214 views
- 5:29About Irreducible Complexityby ManuelLogan4,687 views
- 3:14Re: Evolution is Falseby JPinfinity10,326 views
- 4:52Sample clip "Irreducible Complexity" V010by AccessResearch5,824 views
- 1:48Bacterial Flagellum - Evolution's Nightmare & D...by jameskguy173,128 views
- 7:56How to Pwn a YEC Irreducible Complexity Part 1by JaguarJ0nes7,768 views
- 10:00The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szo...by cdk007495,599 views
- 9:48Evolution IS a Blind Watchmakerby cdk007498,942 views
- 8:09Lets Test Them: Evolution vs. Creationismby DonExodus2598,136 views
- 4:53Emergence - Complexity from Simplicity, Order f...by theinquisitor45,174 views
- 2:05Peanut Butter, The Atheist's Nightmare!by areyoustilllistening1,854,099 views
- 9:19What Every Creationist Must DENYby cdk007308,819 views
- 8:00Top 10 List Why Anti-Evolutionists are WRONGby cdk007111,065 views
- 6:46The evolution of eyesby Faidros8621,843 views
- 3:59Value vs. Complexity & The Product Management Trapby sketchcaster8,932 views
- 6:16Irreducible Complexity (bacterial flagellum) de...by bubbah73,078 views
Seems to me you are making the following error.
First believe evolution is true.
Contingent complexity exists.
Therefore it must have evolved because evolution is true.
Job done.
Why do people who believe as you do assume that any changes required to create the observable existing complexity are stable ?
I mean over the aeons of time required for evolution to act.
Why dont such changes mutate along the way ?
More likely than sitting idle awaiting their day to miraculously fit as req'd.
divvy1400yam600 1 month ago
@DrSunnz God creating everything sounds way more complex to me.
thybigballs 1 month ago
@odinata I would contend that just because something is in a textbook, doesn't make it science. That goes for evolutionism as well as creationism.
jasm707 3 months ago
Hey! i came on this to troll baha, then its the good guys:P Woo first science movie ive found that wasnt made by dumbass theologists trying to disprove reality, well done. Humanity is making progress:D
TheAllien111 3 months ago
@odinata FTW!
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
@FirstFreedomFighter
Not too astutely.
Your religious protests haven't been taken seriously...
odinata 4 months ago
@odinata
I have.
FirstFreedomFighter 4 months ago