Documentary - Moon Landing Hoax - part (3)

Little by little all their lies are coming to the surface. I feel sorry for the bastards when we the people bring them to justice.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Documentary
• Moon
• Landing
• Hoax
• Conspiracy
• Theory
• part

[tattat44]

I love how much they have to edit the actual scientists to get rid of their actual explanations for each hoax. The crackpots get ten minutes literally for every ten seconds the real scientists get to respond. What utter, transparent horseshit.

[MyTube22T]

@tattat44 Tip of the iceberg, friend. Now that you know to what extent a non representative government can go to get what it wants, revisit the BS stories of the sinking of the Lusitania, the Pearl Harbor attack, JFK, OK City Bombing, 911, WMD's in Iraq, War on terror, Afghanistan and now, Iran. We're being governed by sociopathic megalomaniacs who believe any means justify the end even if millions of innocent people have to die. Nothing is what it seems today, and it will get worse.

[Mogpiano1]

"Buzz.........Buzz....we're trying to make a hoax lunar landing....PLEASE close your visor and for Christ's sake put the sandwich down......jeez....."

[MyTube22T]

@Mogpiano1 ROFL

[ssrider7]

i zink they might hoax this,and cover up real mars landing.

[MyTube22T]

@ssrider7 LOL Two words: Keep dreaming. We can't get to the moon which is 380 thousand km away and you think we are going to land on Mars which is 55 million km when it is closest to Earth? Besides, the moon's distance to Earth is constant but Mars' isn't. We don't have propulsion so we have to use the rotational speed of the Earth to sling shot us there. If we "go to Mars" it will be another scam, although with today's technology in cinematography, it would be harder to tell the difference.

[NosoCOMINSOON]

That guy doesn't dispute the evidence, he just denounces the conspiracies and puts down the accusers. Just as the government does to anyone who questions the official 9/11 story.

[tiberiius]

@popeye1579 i'm not sure your tone and if you are mocking me or not, but the question about the shadows at 4:32 seemed to beckon an obvious explanation of the visibility of their suits. do you still think it was pointless for me to point out the reflective quality of white objects?

[popeye1579]

@tattat44 well it is fox...

[popeye1579]

@ilovejdm9 nasa and the thousands of non government contractors and the thousands of engineers(400 hundred thousand employees at nasa alone) and no one ever blew the whistle? there is more evidence that the moon landings were real not a hoax. not to mention the russians who would have been more than happy to expose a hoax .

[popeye1579]

@tiberiius if the moon does not act as a reflective, why can you see it at night then? it lights itself up?

[popeye1579]

@Maloperverso no gps no engines, no radar, no electric power, and yet somehow people managed to and had the technology to land at plymouth and start a colony in 1620?come on wake up america!!! no way we sailed across the ocean back then! it was a hoax !

[MrFLExin]

the only arguments that which hold any weight are the backgrounds being the same in different footages, and the crosshairs behind objects in some of the photos. which are not proof that the whole thing was a hoax, but rather suggest just bad editing or doctoring. the other arguments about shadows and lighting are so obviously and clearly refutable it makes me angry that intelligent ppl take them seriously

[DenizCaroll]

@MyTube22T - You're right it will get worse.

[ilovejdm9]

this shit was fake..damm everyone knws already bt yet nasa keeps denying haha funny

[Tweekerhead]

@MyTube22T Sibrel said it best "thru' television".

You realize this show aired on FOX TV in 2001?

Did you some how believe it to be real or based on facts to be used as scientific analysis?

(snicker....hehe)