Peter Mandelson makes an idiot of himself, part1/2 (04Apr10)

Part 1 of 2: Unelected peer Peter Mandelson gives an interview where he makes a complete idiot of himself, attacking the Conservatives, but strangely silent on what New Labour have ruined over 13 years. If he believes in New Labour, why does he not relinquish his peerage, and stand to be an MP. Or is it that life is too cushy as a peer, and he remains a peer for life, and is accountable to NOBODY.

Recorded from Sky News, 04 April 2010.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• unelected
• unaccountable
• peter
• mandelson
• new
• labour
• cushy
• life
• peer
• uk
• government
• parliament

[ThePirateBo]

WHO VOTED FOR THIS CUNT? NO FUCKING ONE!!!... digital economy bill passed due to him fucking with the laws and rushing it through.

Could someone explain why he is allowed to do anything without being voted for?

[TonyBlairsaWanker]

This 'man' is an utter disgrace. He is a thief, a hypocrite, and aught to be in prison. A so-called socialist, he is of course stinking rich. He made a great deal of money with property deals fueled by money obtained, apparently, by lying to financial institutions.  Again; he should be in prison .. he is a common crook. I suspect that he likes nothing better than dressing in his peer's robes in dress-up games with his boyfriend, whilst floating around on expensive yachts Socialist? Hah!

[TonyBlairsaWanker]

@s13hgp He was, and is, an extremely venal Labour Clone. In fact, he was one of the architects of New Labour. He and Blair created New Labour, with a little help from others. Mandelson is a criminal fraudster, who should have been sent to prison. He is a thief, a liar, and a fraud. He and Blair have made vast sums out of the British taxpayer, and continue to do so. If there are antichrists in this world, he and Blair must surely be up there with the worst of them.

[s13hgp]

@TonyBlairsaWanker ; A typical New Labour Parasitic clone.

[Redcarpet01]

Then WHAT would you call him?

[gwangjuboy1]

@Redcarpet01 You claimed that he was a social democrat. I am telling you that he isn't. It's just a label that people throw around.

[Redcarpet01]

@gwangjuboy1 Your post is totally irrelevant to what I put in. Can't you read?

[gwangjuboy1]

@Redcarpet01 He's also a staunch defender of neo-liberalism and has steadfastly supported policies that increase job insecruity and lead to unemployment. He can call himself what he wants but his record speaks for itself. He wasn't a democrat either; he was a statist. Labels often bare no relation to reality. North Korea calls itself the Democratic Republic of Korea for example.