WTC MIToo Momentum Interference Test
Uploader Comments (psikeyhackr)
Video Responses
All Comments (108)
-
Check the other video. You can't figure out the point of this one.
watch?v=caATBZEKL4c
.
-
@psikeyhackr Because your video is a big failure for several reasons. . 1. YOU can't model a gravity fall, Dumbass. Galileo proved that in the middle ages. A 10 FT fall , is a 10 FT fall, and your model didn't do that. Raise those Washers 10 FT in the air, saw thru 1/2 of the pegs for SIX pegs, then repeat. THIS IS NOT 12 year olds building a model airplane. You have to understand the physics and the math.
-
@psikeyhackr it's a very good point I simply can't believe it, really.
-
@leftysergeant So you are TOO DUMB to figure out the purpose of the STUPID tests.
The purpose was to demonstrate the effect of MASS on the collapse. Because the toothpicks were so strong the falling mass was arrested without the mass of washers. I was showing how MASS changed that behavior and why it is necessary to know the distribution of mass of the WTC towers.
So where is data on the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE on every level of the World Trade Centers?
-
@psikeyhackr The purpose of your stupid test was supposed to be to prove that the process would arrest. You don't even know how many floors your tooth picks are supposed to support before they fail. You need to have that data, i don't, because, as the phenomnon of "verinage" shows, it aint much. According to you, verinage dont work. Your shipment of FAIL is here.
-
@leftysergeant So lets see you specify the weight of a complete floor assembly and provide a link.
The weight of the 205 ft sq concrete slab can be computed from the dimensions & density. That is about 600 tons. But what is the TOTAL WEIGHT with the corrugated pans and 35 and 60 ft trusses? Where is that information on the net. There were 84 standard floor assemblies in each tower. The buildings had to hold themselves up.
Cut the psychological crap and do the physics.
-
@psikeyhackr You don't know what facts to consider. You may even have subconsciously designed it to fail. It in no way demonstrates any process that operated in the towers. The information is available. No one who understands physics or forensic modelling questions it.
Well, it's that day.
9/11/11
TEN YEARS of Bad Physics!
The Physics Profession has not demanded accurate data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the towers. Who cares about Potential Energy and the Conservation of Momentum?
I guess it is time to burn Isaac Newton in effigy.
psikeyhackr 4 months ago in playlist More videos from psikeyhackr
perhaps you could show us the ballpark physics involved of a plane hitting a building?
MysticalGrooveWTC 1 year ago
@MysticalGrooveWTC
Do a search on WTC Impact Model - MIT
watch?v=z0kUICwO93Q
The NIST report contains a graph of the south tower oscillating for Four Minutes after the impact. Now how can the damped oscillation of the structure be analyzed without knowing the distribution of mass? So how have all of the physics people in the country managed to not be interested in that for EIGHT YEARS?
psikeyhackr 1 year ago