Steven Pinker on the computational theory of mind and evolutionary psychology. Our mental faculties assume a world like that of our ancestors. Pinker describes some of the tricks our minds do, whic...
Steven Pinker on the computational theory of mind and evolutionary psychology. Our mental faculties assume a world like that of our ancestors. Pinker describes some of the tricks our minds do, which helped us in the natural world, but can lead to maladaptive behaviour in the modern world.
From a conference in 1998 called Der Digitale Planet (The Digital Planet, I guess), which also included Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Jared Diamond and Douglas Adams. Links follow:
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
To be clear on my last comment, I mean to say that there are other important factors which have influenced the way the brain is today. Of these we can count the hunger instinct, the innate like of sugars and fats, predator avoidance mechanism, etc.
Of course this does make invalid the fact that lust is an important factor, I simply wanted to put it into perspective.
Yeah, survival and reproduction created the human mind. I gave you that somewhere a few posts below. I was just making the point that lust (reproduction) rather than survival was an even more important factor in the shaping of the mind.
So, no, lust is still an important factor. In fact, many of the brains modules evolved due to lust (the language module being one).
I'm not being implicit. I'm explicitly attaching a lot of importance to it. Without lust, morality wouln't have become adaptive, language wouldn't have become adaptive, love wouldn't have become adaptive, etc. I'm not looking at lust as being just one aspect of the brain, I'm looking at it as being the main driver of the brain, highly connected to the rest of these modules (adaptations).
I'm lying. I was using "love" in the marriage sense, above. Familial love isn't a product of lust, but of survival.
I'm not looking at your girl. NO, Natalie Thiem, I wasn't looking at you when you were dressed like Barney (the dress that didn't fit you right, with the fat, pasty legs) or in the Laker's Jersey with your small titties showing through. Tell The Wiffle and Whiteboy that I wasn't looking at you, PLEASE.)
It's not just my brain, it's all ofour brains. And it's n ot just at this age, it's at every age of our lives. You're too unintelligent and uneducated to comprehend this. But keep reading my blogs and you might get an idea. And don't refer to me as son.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
To be clear on my last comment, I mean to say that there are other important factors which have influenced the way the brain is today. Of these we can count the hunger instinct, the innate like of sugars and fats, predator avoidance mechanism, etc.
Of course this does make invalid the fact that lust is an important factor, I simply wanted to put it into perspective.
Cheers.
So, no, lust is still an important factor. In fact, many of the brains modules evolved due to lust (the language module being one).
I think you might be implicitly attaching a little too much importance to the adaptive importance of lust.
I'm not looking at your girl. NO, Natalie Thiem, I wasn't looking at you when you were dressed like Barney (the dress that didn't fit you right, with the fat, pasty legs) or in the Laker's Jersey with your small titties showing through. Tell The Wiffle and Whiteboy that I wasn't looking at you, PLEASE.)