Steven Pinker on the computational theory of mind and evolutionary psychology. Our mental faculties assume a world like that of our ancestors. Pinker describes some of the tricks our minds do, whic...
Steven Pinker on the computational theory of mind and evolutionary psychology. Our mental faculties assume a world like that of our ancestors. Pinker describes some of the tricks our minds do, which helped us in the natural world, but can lead to maladaptive behaviour in the modern world.
From a conference in 1998 called Der Digitale Planet (The Digital Planet, I guess), which also included Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Jared Diamond and Douglas Adams. Links follow:
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Lust (or what most people prefer to call Love) and it's consequnces (offspring) is what drove the development of the human brain and just about all of it's functions. So you cannot say the emotion of Love (or what I like to call Lust) is a byproduct of the brain's true function (It is its sole function. Everything the brain does is tied into attracting and maintaining a mate). The two are inextricably tied together; one (Lust) causing the other (sophisticated functions of the brain).
How Sexual Selection shaped the mind. OKAY, my edcated nig, uh, excuse me my educated brotha. (You'd think The Mating Mind was the only evolutionary book I'd ever read in my life, huh.) HAHA
The mind is not a computer or a Swiss Army Knife or any other lame analogy similar to those that has been used to describe it.
It's not just my brain, it's all ofour brains. And it's n ot just at this age, it's at every age of our lives. You're too unintelligent and uneducated to comprehend this. But keep reading my blogs and you might get an idea. And don't refer to me as son.
agree, zoaguyver. i mean really, did this guy not think for a second about what he was saying? 'engineering excellence of the mind' (!?) something engineered requires an engineer, definitive fact.
i cant see why he would choose such wording without having a really bad grasp of language or being a creationist (or any term you like for anyone above agnostic on the 'more than there is' belief scale. that said though, i know some agnostics that hold unevidenced, wish thinking type 'beliefs').
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Many of the human mind's adaptations evolved through Natural Selection (what would help us survive).
I SLEPT AT ANOTHER HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS, Y'ALL.
The mind is not a computer or a Swiss Army Knife or any other lame analogy similar to those that has been used to describe it.
i cant see why he would choose such wording without having a really bad grasp of language or being a creationist (or any term you like for anyone above agnostic on the 'more than there is' belief scale. that said though, i know some agnostics that hold unevidenced, wish thinking type 'beliefs').