Agricultural Transgenics: Science vs. Conspiracy, pt. 1- KazukiSeirei
Uploader Comments (EvoGenVideos)
Video Responses
All Comments (26)
-
First of all there is nothing wrong with organic.
A) The use verity species can mitigate viral/ fungicidal issue this is also true for environmental problem such as flood/drought .
B) Growing crops without the use of chemical fertilizer will yield the same amount of crops.
-
I love how there are flat earth luddites saying no gmos and flat earth luddites saying no global warming and they're acting like they don't have everything in common with each other.
-
genetics is awesome, dont know whether to try to go into genetics or herpotology
-
@traog : there are a lot of dumb people over here, too!
-
@EvoGenVideos There's a warner brothers cartoon about an elephant that stood about 6 inches at the shoulder. Whoever can engineer that for a pet will make a fortune.
-
@EvoGenVideos That's too bad, Mad Cow and GMO have little in common.
While cation should be used, IMO, GMOs are far safer than dumping huge quantities of chemicals into the environment to produce food.
The only GMO danger is inserting proteins from allergens into other foods, then allergy sufferers will die. I don't know how they can protect against that.
adolthitler 9 months ago
@adolthitler That's actually complete crap. They still have to be labelled if they do, but taking the genes from one thing and inserting it into another, given the successive breeding that's done prior to approval, by the time a transgenic organism is ready for market, any contact it had with the allergens is gone. Otherwise, that one gene isn't going to cause an allergic reaction.
EvoGenVideos 9 months ago
@EvoGenVideos Maybe I was unclear in how I initially described what I meant. But the gene from a peanut inserted into another plant to confer some benefit, would leave an allergic person at risk.
adolthitler 9 months ago
@adolthitler And you apparently didn't understand what I said back. The gene from a peanut doesn't produce the peanut itself, but a protein. Allergic reactions are the product of certain antigens reacting to certain chemicals, which scientists know exactly what they are. Unless the aim was to produce these allergen chemicals, as opposed to another protein, which is unlikely, then no, it wouldn't put anyone at risk.
EvoGenVideos 9 months ago