Evidence Against Darwin - Lee Strobel

Lee Strobel here clearly outlines some of the evidence against the theory of evolution between species (Macro-evolution), of which there is absolutely NO evidence.

Did you know that in a letter to Asa Gray, a Harvard professor, Charles Darwin himself wrote:
''I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science.'' He speculated future discoveries might confirm his theory, yet they have only proved it false.

Skeptics: Can you think of one example of a mutation that has caused a true increase in genetic complexity? Evolution would require billions of them. Can you name just one?

Visit www.leestrobel.com for hundreds of other excellent FREE Christian videos.

Todd Tyszka
www.toddtyszka.com



lee strobel atheist agnostic skeptic apologist apologetic apologetics charles darwin evolution evolve evolved evolves Bible Scripture Scriptures proof prove proves science scientific Scientist Scientists species fossil record fossils evidence Intelligent Design ID Jesus Christ Creator created creation big bang spoke Genesis

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• lee
• strobel
• atheist
• agnostic
• skeptic
• apologist
• apologetic
• apologetics
• charles
• darwin
• evolution
• evolve
• evolved
• evolves
• Bible
• Scripture
• Scriptures
• proof
• prove
• proves
• science
• scientific
• Scientist
• Scientists
• species
• fossil
• record
• fossils
• evidence
• Intelligent
• Design
• ID
• Jesus
• Christ
• Creator
• created
• creation
• big
• bang
• spoke
• Genesis

[BurazSC2]

Why is this video referencing Darwin in the title, when it has nothing to do with him or evolution?

Does someone no understand theory, much.

[KL8NHAJJ150N]

Alfred Russel Wallace, British naturalist, explorer, geographer, anthropologist and biologist (1823 – 1913) - "There are laws of nature but they are purposeful. Everywhere we look we are confronted by power and intelligence."

[KL8NHAJJ150N]

An Article in a 09 addition of New Scientist mag entitled, “Uprooting Darwin’s Tree,” quoted evolutionary scientist Eric Bapteste as saying in context, “We have no evidence at all that the tree of life is a reality.” The same article quotes evolutionary biologist Michael Rose as saying: “The tree of life is being politely buried, we all know that. What’s less accepted is that our whole fundamental view of biology needs to change.” This is coming from evolutionary scientists & biologists, not me.

[ashokupad]

He is attempting to find fault with evidence for evolution, not provide evidence against it. But he leaves out that reproductions of Miller's exp with revised early-earth conditions have also produced biomolecules. He quotes scientists, but does not bother to explain the context of their comments. And as usual, he proceeds from the assumption that if evolution with its ample supporting evidence is a false model, then Biblical Creation must be correct, despite nonexistant evidence.

[gregrutz]

@alexthasy You can't prove the Flying Spaghetti Monster is not the one true God.

[gregrutz]

Evolution is not about the origin of life, what an IDiot.

[ozowen]

@KL8NHAJJ150N

Yup, I note you appear to be an ID'er. Makes little difference. ID has been fairly influenced by the YECS agenda and a lot of their techniques.

[KL8NHAJJ150N]

@ozowen BTW. I'm not a Young Earth Creationist. Again your making untrue assumptions about me.

[ozowen]

@KL8NHAJJ150N

Just to be clear- I am not accusing you of this, I am however levelling that accusation at the site(s) you derived it from. You chose to quote him, you place the quote in context and decide that it fits or not.

I dunno how often I have seen, for example some YECS source quoting Darwin re fossils or the eye or aboriginal people with a careful selection that, when placed back in context gives the opposite meaning to the one they inferred. Doesn't stop at Darwin either.