Uploaded by stevebee92653 on Dec 17, 2008
Explains why complex visual systems could not have evolved by selected mutations.
Category:
Tags:
License:
Standard YouTube License
-
Artist: Adam & The Ants
-
-
Buy "Antmusic" on:
Android Market,
AmazonMP3, iTunes -
-
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (stevebee92653)
Video Responses
All Comments (407)
-
@Stinukli So once upon a time Monkeys starting evolving, and then after a looooong long time Humans we're ready, but when these humans starting talking about it, All the Stages from Monkey to Man were gone ! And surely their weren't only one single middle stage. Why is it then that today we only see Primitive Monkeys ? Should'n monkeys evolve ? Should'n other Animals have moved past the Animal stage by now ? you people amaze me, a small child can see its fake.
mukkohaha 1 month ago
-
@stevebee92653 When i were Atheist i never bought the Evolution theory, I always thought " we will never know " then i found out about Satan's plan on Earth, Try watch my video " Illuminati in 15 minutes "
mukkohaha 1 month ago
-
1st:
"There are 2 possibilities for why mollusks didn't all evolve complex eyes with lenses"
Then, answer #1:
"all of the mollusks din't climb Mt. impossible"
Nice contradiction, and poor attemp to discredit Science.
Answer #1 should be:
"Not all mullusks were able to climb the Mt.".
Instead of trying to descredit Science, which is responsible for over 90% of the entertainment you enjoy, prove the EXISTENCE of God to scientists since you are the one claiming to know that God exists.
godwithin060988 1 month ago
-
pretty funny vid :)
thestonylein 2 months ago
-
@stevebee92653 This has VERY LITTLE to do with Dawkins.
Stinukli 3 months ago
8:51
The Origin of Life Made Difficultby stevebee9265317,632 views
8:43
The Age of the Universe: a Paradoxby stevebee926536,853 views
8:57
The Evolution of Birds and Flight: It's impossible Part 2by stevebee926532,966 views
6:57
Eye Evolution-It's Impossibleby stevebee9265313,807 views
8:38
The Evolution of Birds and Flight: It's impossible Part 1by stevebee926536,640 views
9:04
Richard Dawkins, Ev-illusionist, Exposedby stevebee926534,490 views
9:40
Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 28)by Thunderf00t246,525 views
8:18
Irreducible Complexity Revisited-Why It's Realby stevebee926533,696 views
10:00
God or Evolution? Look at the human eye & decide for yourself! part 2by shocka2008638 views
8:45
Abiogenesis Made Difficult Pt. 2by stevebee926532,365 views
6:26
Abiogenesis: Living Cells in SIx Minutesby stevebee926534,781 views
5:36
Richard Dawkins: Closet Believer in Intelligent Designby stevebee926532,795 views
5:01
Evolution of Skin: It's Impossibleby stevebee9265311,569 views
3:40
Eye Evolution-It's Impossible Part 2by stevebee926535,741 views
4:18
Evolution Glossaryby stevebee926531,986 views
4:29
Is "Intelligent Design" Real?by stevebee926532,658 views
5:48
Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 2).by Thunderf00t629,174 views
3:11
Abiogenesis Made Difficult: An Addendumby stevebee926531,218 views
4:56
BIrd Evolution: It's Impossible Pt. 3by stevebee9265313,190 views
1:41
Richard Dawkins: Quote Mine Crybabyby stevebee926531,829 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Great videos mate. I liken eye evolution to that of a car motor. Would anyone believe that sloppy workers making random errors while making steam engines could "over a long period of time" end up with an internal combustion engine. Or what about dodgy factory workers making video players "over a long period of time" producing a DVD player. While simultaneously dodgy video tape manufacturers produce DVD discs which are compatible with the DVD player. That is actually more likely than evolution.
ian9toes 1 month ago
@ian9toes THAT is a perfect example. Thanks! And how do people believe this stuff SO adamantly? That is the miracle of evolution. Thanks for the great comment.
stevebee92653 1 month ago
Great Point ! maker of the video, You both made a Really Funny video, that made me laugh at Richard Dawkin, while Making a great point at the same time
mukkohaha 1 month ago
@mukkohaha Thanks! So nice to have a rare "thinker" on board.
stevebee92653 1 month ago
3:39 That doesn't make much sense... #1 has nothing to do with the fact that some did. The fact that all animals have not evolved wings from previous structures, does not mean that none did. #2 is AN ASSERTION that needs further specification, and of course most important: Documentation. Mammal eyes, eagle eyes, etc. have gone through amazingly improbable steps. Have you ever heard of the concept of "unrepeatability of evolution"?
Stinukli 3 months ago
@Stinukli Right.Unrepeatability of evolution....a fantasy born of a fantasy. Just declare that you are a believer, and in lock step. You are willing to believe anything any evo-guru tells you. You are stuck on Dawkins hillock, and you can't get off. What more can be said?
stevebee92653 3 months ago