No, you can't run your car on water - it's a scam
Uploader Comments (xjet)
Video Responses
All Comments (3,244)
-
Well, I guess I'll just be sitting next to my HHO dry cell, lawnmower engine, alternators, and view some articles made by dumbfucks like you on my laptop, with the help of an inverter.
-
Wow I have little morals so I would love to sell this stuff LOL
Think of all the people I could sell this to and sleep well in my new house
-
A very accurate video. Sure it's possible to run a car on hydrogen but the idea that hydrogen produced by an onboard electrolysis cell can save you fuel or run an engine is a pure hoax! The people who say they are saving fuel by fitting electrolysis cells can't seem to provide any sort of real proof that their claims are true surprisingly enough...
-
Cointelpro
-
yes it works ya egg iv watched it working ! disinfo agent
-
ok if the hho hoax why my car consumes less diesel fuel than when I built the HHO generator?
-
@xjet Unfortunately you are wrong. You tube: Ultimate hho. We are proving that HHO works one vehicle at a time.
The problem is you're attacking the idea that your car can "run on water." Of course you're not "running on water" or hydrogen even. You're injecting it into your fuel to help combust your fuel more efficiently, since hydrogen is more explosive. You lose fuel economy making the hydrogen, but gain even more in combustion your own fuel better. So, for the idiots thinking you can run on just HHO, it doesn't work. simple thermodynamics. But as for injecting into your gasoline or diesel, yes it does.
Dudanation12 4 months ago
@Dudanation12 Unfortunately you are wrong. The levels of H2/O2 required to produce an improvement on combustion efficiency that would offset the energy cost of producing that gas via onboard electrolysis is too high for any standard vehicle's electrical system. The amount of electrical energy required is several kilowatts -- far more than *any* car alternator can deliver and even then, the extra load requires *more* fuel to be burned.
xjet 4 months ago
@xjet
I don't see why there is a defining amount of hydrogen which would be required to achieve more efficiency. If I put in a little, I get back a little. Put in a lot, possibly a lot more. A real load of it, probably going out the tailpipe. I'll be finding out, I have one installed and I keep very good records and observations. We'll see.
Dudanation12 3 months ago
@Dudanation12 Refer to the SAE and NASA studies on hydrogen enrichment. You'll find the data there. Basically, they show that relatively high levels of H2 are required to show any significant improvement in combustion efficiencies. The problem with these onboard H2/O2 generators is that they simply can't create enough gas to have a measurable effect and even when they do, the energy cost (in terms of electrical power) far exceeds the energy recovered through that combustion improvement.
xjet 3 months ago