The Future of Nuclear Power in the US
Loading...
Loading...
2,431
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 1:15:26The 2012 CLARK KERR LECTURES Lecture 1: Dynamic...by UCBerkeleyEvents81 views
- 1:02:38Conversations with History - Philip Bobbittby UCBerkeleyEvents10 views
- 22:19Journeys Through Sociology: Emma Porioby UCBerkeleyEvents244 views
- 15:06Course Threads: Musings on Human-Centered Designby UCBerkeleyEvents68 views
- 7:15U.S. Naval Nuclear Power Training Commandby Jobeld7952,725 views
- 9:51Nuclear Power Plantby acmeschool3,495 views
- 0:25How to Make Nuclear Bombby How2makes56,789 views
- 10:08Who's Afraid of Nuclear Power? - 45min. documen...by journeymanpictures66,873 views
- 48:27Lecture - 12 Nuclear Power Generationby nptelhrd7,880 views
- 4:54Sen. Barack Obama on nuclear power from Sentine...by SentinelSourceDotCom14,709 views
- 4:53Nuclear Powerby GlobeWatch903,850 views
- 6:38Nuclear Energy will Save the Planet - Join In!by U235Man14,982 views
- 2:37How to Make A Nuclear Reactorby dodchorn266,090 views
- 5:12Nuclear Energy Part 1by unix49459,142 views
- 1:40Robot Violinistby diagonaluk6,169,408 views
- 10:34Nuclear Fusionby stevebd1445,050 views
- 9:59Let's Do It Like France Does It: Nuclear Powerby corvusblog19,062 views
- 7:00Future of Nuclear Powerby wluk302 views
- 3:42Global Warming: NASA study suggests extreme sum...by sookietex57,051 views
- 10:13We Need Nuclear Energy!by LaRoucheisright2,831 views
I think nice lecture.
flowewritharoma 11 months ago
@gunthaarz Wave power? You mean Hydro? (Well that's what it's called in Canada).
I idea it's a good idea but it kills fish and can ruin their migration patterns although i wouldn't mind fake rivers that'd be fine with me.
SniperViper1000 1 year ago
@SniperViper1000 wave power has been researched in sweden and has come a long way. really enormous amounts of weight and energy is stored in even very small waves if you have huge pontoons coupled with some kind of leverage system. Images are available of the swedish research stations. All this has been known for a century but zero invested in research. Someone is holding us all back.
gunthaarz 1 year ago
@gunthaarz Solar panels and wind power isn't efficent enough say what you want but with the cost to build and transport energy it would be more profitable to builb nuclear plants something that in my eye is the future.
SniperViper1000 1 year ago
@gigibson2718 .. hm.. you know, it's not immediately profitable to run schools, or military, but we do it anyway. Actually pouring money into the military is just pure consume. So. building solar energy and wind energy is profitable as hell in comparison. And if we had to choose between surviving and building solar panels and windmills.. well, we would survive AND build them, AND make a profit.
gunthaarz 2 years ago
I don't think its an issue of whether it's perfect or not. Of course it's not 100% efficient, nothing is. The question that we, as a race, need to ask ourselves is, "is there anything anywhere near as viable as nuclear power in the near future?" The answer is no. I hate to tell all you wind/solar/geothermal people, but 50 years from now is too late.
gigibson2718 2 years ago
Energy saving and efficency programs can create ten times more energy than thousands of windmills or dozens of nuclear powerplants. a nuclear plant costs billions to build and operate and clean up. So its a huge drain on the economy, inefficient and lacks cleaning. No most nuclear waste is not recyclable. a tiny part. Sellafield UK plant was built to recycle waste but check its efficiency... it does not have a good record..
gunthaarz 2 years ago