Re: The Blasphemy Challenge

I, Danieru of http://www.huge-entity.com , have a few things to deny....

(In response to http://www.blasphemychallenge.com)

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• rational
• response
• blasphemy
• challenge
• atheism
• christianity
• god
• jesus
• atheist
• holy
• spirit
• huge-entity.com
• logic
• science

[chica0616]

Are people incapable of thinking for themselves anymore? I suppose it's true because this is a perfect example of someone who felt it necessary to display his ignorance on a video made to blaspheme love. The bible has record of an atheists mentality and you and your video are only proof that the bible that you condemn is actually correct. This video is an example of the validity of the bible because it explains exactly how atheists would act so foolishly.

[pointyfinger]

best not to piss off the religious people Danny boy,....they take their beliefs (right or wrong)very seriously...have a nice day!

[cybersoufiane]

fank you very mutf for fis video

[thwonk121]

sounds good

[hugeentity]

It's hard to talk about these concepts here further. Have you wandered my site at all? Its forum? The link if in the description to this video. You'll find my perceptions laid out pretty thickly there; join the forum for a more in depth chat. Would be nice to see you there.... Cheers, Dan

[hugeentity]

Everything is subjective to an extent. The scientist, when asked how she came up with her groundbreaking idea, is likely to say 'in the shower' or 'I don't really know'. Inspiration is imagination is perception is truth, in a sense.

[thwonk121]

I find it interesting you said you prefer an ever-changing theory to a stationary Theology. So, if I understand you right, your belief that the universe(s) came from nothing because of nothing is based primarily on personal preference of theories since there is no empirical reason follow them?

[thwonk121]

hugeentity,

Ya, I really like Michio Kaku's stuff too. He's definitely a brilliant guy. I also like Stephen Hawking's work on the more theoretical parts of physics as well. Although I've only read the more popular works of both of these guys, since I'm not a scientist by trade myself.

[hugeentity]

It wasn't just faith. Check out Michio Kaku's books on String Theory or Briane Green's 'The Elegant Universe'. I agree that there are only such things as theories, but better to follow an imperfect, ever-evolving theory than accept on faith a stationary, non-changing theology.

God needn't be part of any equation, and don't even get me started about the ridiculousness of Jesus...