Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Teaneck Election Fraud - Q & A Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
412 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 26, 2007

Q & A Part 2

The Teaneck community asks questions about the 2006 Election Fraud

Thursday July 12th

The county prosecutor was asked to look into illegal postcards and robocalls in the days preceding the 2006 municipal election. The required attribution was not given on the cards or during the calls stating who financed the cards and calls. Lack of an attribution constitutes election fraud and/or mail fraud! No report from the prosecutor has been issued.

Ron Schwartz shares Information on th Election Fraud during the 2006 Teaneck Elections.


· The information discovered in the prosecutor's files

· Who in Teaneck may have been responsible.

· What the prosecutor is doing to bring those involved to justice!

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thank you very much, TheGreen, for this service.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more