Jim Fetzer 9/11 - evidence for unconventional weapons (4)

Dr. Fetzer gives supporting evidence to his hypothesis that unconventional weapons may have been used to cause the devastation of the world trade center on september 11'th 2001. Recorded at the Columbus Metropolitan Library on 2/17/2007.

scholars for 911 truth government conspiracy alex jones patriot movement noam chomsky left gatekeeper federal reserve cia nsa fbi fema contracts money david rockefeller foundation america george bush dick cheney imf world bank united nations civil liberties mysteries movement grass roots oklahoma city kennedy assassination northwoods operation controlled demolition evidence pentagon wtc 7 world trade center twin towers new york washington dc shanksville pa norad stand down drills united airlines flight 93 port authority steve jones why did fall airport security big brother control grid pnac cfr who wto imf project for new american century council on foreign relations bilderberg international monetary fund tim osman osama bin laden 767 757 boeing thermite thermate ground zero first responder nyfd peace federal emergency management association atf

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• jim
• fetzer

[amosmudd]

Go get his level of education then debate him and show him how wrong he is. I'm not sorry people don't like it. You shouldn't need a PHD to understand that what he is pointing out makes sense... Not to mention he does not claim to know exactly how it was done. He very plainly speculates a possibility. Sorry the world isn't flat, I know it would be easier that way.

[lexxellent]

google

scaler waves

tesla

If you can only agree because you understand everything we will be waiting a long time. I congratulate Jim on the questions he raises based on physics laws that are applied today but were violated on 9-11. Show me the maths that proves what Jim says about the time the towers took to come down is wrong, somebody, anybody?

[TruthMakesPeace]

Jim is a great a American

[1DX2020]

being at the scene does'nt equate to a full understanding of events. thats not to say i subsribe to any conspiracy theory...the point i make stands alone. in general...if i want to know about causes of an event i will wait or look for info from academics...this was a huge event. i think answering some of the questions it has raised is beyond average civilians, police of fireman..with all due and deserved respect to them.

[kevinivers]

So this guy sitting out there hundreds of miles away knows everything - and the thousands of people who were there in Lower Manhattan, including firemen, police, and average civilians who saw it all happen were wrong? What complete lunacy.

[LwSiX]

If your looking for a further explanation on the astrology reference i might have a link for you, send me a message if your still interested.

[ElPavo2]

Agree with BakuninXL. Either Fetzer has flipped out, or more probably, he has been turned. Not only is Steven Jones a far better scientist, as a Mormon who stood up to BYU's Savonarola tactics, he has proven his integrity. Fetzer is only doing truthout damage. Maybe that is his intention.

[Yantsos]

Molten metal is more than a hypothesis.

[machstem]

BTW, I've worked in "Star Wars" before Ronnie invented the term (under Carter) and there is NO WAY HELs could have brought the WTC down. Fetzer is full of FECES! Look at what Steven Jones says. HE knows what happened!

[machstem]

Just google Dr. Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood to see what kind of intelect resides behind Fetzer/Renolds "logic" on WTC. Lasers my ass.

[amosmudd]

From what I can tell, he simply ran out of time and in his summation he mentioned something about the moon that certainly needs further explanation. Don't write off one of the most brilliant minds working in our favor just because he didn't explain EVERYTHING so that EVERYONE can understand it.