Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ron Paul on Cavuto 3-10-09

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
343 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 10, 2009

Spread the message of freedom and individual liberty by rating and commenting on this video, as well as reposting it.

Please visit the following sites for more information:

http://infowars.com
http://restoretherepublic.com
http://prisonplanet.tv
http://campaignforliberty.com

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.
-Thomas Jefferson

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • do you know what an earmark is, retard?

  • Ron Paul is right. he is intelligent, unlike most people.

  • Ron Paul - what a complete hypocrite - he votes no on appropriations bill but packs his own pork knowing that it will pass with Democrat votes. ron paul is king hypocrite. What libertarian would do this? YOU PEOPLE are drinking Koolaid, if any liberal or conservative said what Ron Paul did here you would call him a hypocrite. Your cult of personality is amazing. You call Cavuto names but don't address his legitimate question - why vote no but still pack your pork "Someone else will spend it?

  • I am sick of Fixed News. They were unfair to Paul in the election and they are purposely trying to hurt his reputation. They know how much the Liberetarian Movement has gained in the last couple years.

  • Neil is being intellectually dishonest here. All appropriations of Congress should be detailed to the penny. Paul doesn't come off here as clear as he probably otherwise is capable of, but the problem is that the bills themselves are unconstitutional, in that the federal government grants itself jurisdiction in the states. So the problem isn't "earmarks", but rather the states have become slaves to the purse of the government over time via unconstitutional means.

  • Ron Paul!!

  • 1% huh? If that's true getting rid of all the pork wouldn't change anything.

  • I think they are the same thing just different names. Why? Who knows.

  • i think we need to make a media stink about this one gize...

    gathering the internet and having ron paul supporters email - in efforts to enlighten cavuto - would be the only real way to get rid of this item that MSM has latched onto for a year now.

  • What people don't seem to understand is that an earmark takes some of the money in the appropriations bill and says that it has to be spent on that project.

    So we give $1M to the transportation department, and attached to that bill is $100K for a bridge to be repaired.

    That means the Trans dept gets $1M, then $100K of that is spent on the bridge leaving $900K for them to spend as they please.

    They "could" choose to fix that bridge, or they could have spent that money on whatever they wanted.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more