Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ancient Aliens and the Gullibility Factor Part Two.wmv

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
215 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 12, 2011

Part Two -- Dr. Rush explores the gullibility factor and the Ancient Alien Hunters' absurd contention that Thor's Hammer and the Ark of the Covenant are alien weapons.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Osiris12gates)

  • Thank you for your comments. Yes, the AAHs use the word "possibility" but it rapidly turns into fact. Why is "possibility" being presented as history? Von Daniken claims his position is a "possibility" - view my May 19 video (Aliens Revisited Part 1) for a direct quote as fact.The claims are science fiction at best. The "Big Bang" is a theory, not fact - no respected cosmologist would call it fact, although the math supports part of the position. Again, I appreciate all comments.

  • Wayofliving - show me the proof; all I hear from the UFO crowd is anger and frustration because I ask for hard evidence. Anyone can say they were abducted; I've watched the unconvincing hypnosis sessions (I was a hypnotherapist for over 35 years). Yes, weather balloons - where is the evidence to prove otherwise? Oh, yes, government coverup. Crop circles? Aliens come billions of miles to mess up a corn field! Some sort of code you say? Very stupid aliens if that's the best they can do.

  • I find it interesting that none of the true believers in the ancient alien hypothesis are willing to address the works of Mandelker (The 2300 BC Event) and Bond and Hempsell (A Sumerian Observation of the Kofels' Impact Event). Moreover, much of what is presented as ancient alien technology is explainable and I do not think it good science to jump from the one-percent anomalies to aliens. I realize, however, that we need a new myth to live by.

    John A. Rush

  • I am very disappointed in the History Channel and suggest to my students they be very cautious of the information presented. My new description of their programming is the “Pseudo-History Channel.” The continual playing of the Ancient Alien Hunters and the programs on UFOs only serve to perpetuate a myth and mislead the public. Thanks for your comment

    John A. Rush

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • We have to have dinner and you need to hear my evidence on The Ark of the Covenant ; )

  • I enjoyed your video! But the Ancient Alien series on the History channel only presents its evidence as speculations. Words like "could" or "would it be possible" litter its narrative, I don't share your view that it is harmful unless people take a very dogmatic stance to promoting these ideas. Many people argue the big bang theory despite the contradiction of half the stars in our own galaxy being older than the big bang itself!

  • How to be boring lesson 01

    In one hand, you said media is a business to manipulated people, in the other hand you talk like media and you are reading like them.

    You also said High Flying Weather Balloon, you know how to lose you credibility in 2 seconds mister. Drugs? You obviously didn't go to the source

    You can't deny thousand cases of abductions

    You can't ignore those flying saucer on many cameras, they aren't all fake mister.

    Some Crop Circle cannot be done by man, they are too complex

  • I would warn against taking the history channels ancient aliens as the be all end all for proof of ancient aliens. Some of those people are known for making stretches. There is tons of evidence out therefrom people that are NOT part of that group.

  • oh, and i completely agree with your statement on the history channel, all tho i would take it a little further. personally i haven't watched television in over 7 years. everything i get of information comes from the internet or books. the internet brought me to james arthur in my quest for the holy grail of ecstasy, which brought me to gnostic media, which brought me to you, which gave me another mentor and a new hobby -- finding amanita muscaria symbolism in religious artwork. you've seen one.

  • the reason i support charlie sheen is because he is one of the few celebrities who spoke out against 911. (youtube search charlie sheen message to the president). on top of that he is hilarious and is indeed an excellent rolemodel to certain individuals who are into rock'n'roll.

    other than that, i support charlie sheen because i wouldn't like to be called out into the public and shamed just because i enjoy daily doses of muscaria and iboga. it's none of the publics business what i ingest.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more