Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Buffers and Hendersen-Hasselbalch

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
55,052
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Oct 13, 2010

Buffers and the Hendersen-Hasselbalch equation

Category:

Education

Tags:

Download this video

LICENSE: Creative Commons (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works).

For more information about this license, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

High-quality MP4 Learn more

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @rinwhr He makes a comment in a previous video that he makes some wrong assumptions in the last 3-4 min. So he made this video that just cut the last few minutes off.

  • thanks for the conceptual idea of hendersen hasselbalch but can you teach us ICE tables???

  • I have done HH a dozen times never even though it was derrived from the original equation

    tks

  • as always thank you kindly for your great instructions. i was wondering, are you left handed? thanx

  • ur awesome!!!!!!!!!

  • @savvy22dew Nearest I can tell, you have mistake the "p" in this equation as a regular variable. It is actually the short hand for -log(). Thus p(Ka) = -log(Ka) and p(HA/A) = - log(HA/A). Log functions have a few unique properties, one of which is that log(X*Y) = Log(X) + Log(Y), which explains why

    p(K * [HA]/[A-]) = pK - log [HA]/[A].

    Sal has a proof of this concept on his website in the algebra section if you are interested in why this is so. Hoped that helped!

  • I love you Sal

  • Did you distribute wrong?

    for calculating the hendersen-hasselbalch eq.-

    p(K * [HA]/[A-]) = pK k * [HA]/[A-] NOT pK - log [HA]/[A]

    you can only distribute if the things inside parenthesis are added or subtracted:

    6(3+2) = 6*3 + 6*2 = 18 + 12 = 30 and 6(3+2) = 6 * 5 = 30 so it checks out

    you did 6(3*2) = 6*3 + 6*2 = 30 but 6*6 = 36. Not Equal!!

    so i am confused. i think i explained why well enough, would someone clarify for me?

  • @norwayte He cut off the end since he said that volume doesn't matter.

  • Did it get cut off at the end...?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more