@rinwhr He makes a comment in a previous video that he makes some wrong assumptions in the last 3-4 min. So he made this video that just cut the last few minutes off.
@savvy22dew Nearest I can tell, you have mistake the "p" in this equation as a regular variable. It is actually the short hand for -log(). Thus p(Ka) = -log(Ka) and p(HA/A) = - log(HA/A). Log functions have a few unique properties, one of which is that log(X*Y) = Log(X) + Log(Y), which explains why
p(K * [HA]/[A-]) = pK - log [HA]/[A].
Sal has a proof of this concept on his website in the algebra section if you are interested in why this is so. Hoped that helped!
@rinwhr He makes a comment in a previous video that he makes some wrong assumptions in the last 3-4 min. So he made this video that just cut the last few minutes off.
BF1 1 month ago
thanks for the conceptual idea of hendersen hasselbalch but can you teach us ICE tables???
namanphoto 3 months ago
I have done HH a dozen times never even though it was derrived from the original equation
tks
jsmcrawler 4 months ago
as always thank you kindly for your great instructions. i was wondering, are you left handed? thanx
RISEofTIBET 4 months ago
ur awesome!!!!!!!!!
FarrahGreye 8 months ago
@savvy22dew Nearest I can tell, you have mistake the "p" in this equation as a regular variable. It is actually the short hand for -log(). Thus p(Ka) = -log(Ka) and p(HA/A) = - log(HA/A). Log functions have a few unique properties, one of which is that log(X*Y) = Log(X) + Log(Y), which explains why
p(K * [HA]/[A-]) = pK - log [HA]/[A].
Sal has a proof of this concept on his website in the algebra section if you are interested in why this is so. Hoped that helped!
UnclePorkflaps 8 months ago
I love you Sal
hahs4 9 months ago
Did you distribute wrong?
for calculating the hendersen-hasselbalch eq.-
p(K * [HA]/[A-]) = pK k * [HA]/[A-] NOT pK - log [HA]/[A]
you can only distribute if the things inside parenthesis are added or subtracted:
6(3+2) = 6*3 + 6*2 = 18 + 12 = 30 and 6(3+2) = 6 * 5 = 30 so it checks out
you did 6(3*2) = 6*3 + 6*2 = 30 but 6*6 = 36. Not Equal!!
so i am confused. i think i explained why well enough, would someone clarify for me?
savvy22dew 9 months ago
@norwayte He cut off the end since he said that volume doesn't matter.
Transpacity 10 months ago
Did it get cut off at the end...?
rinwhr 10 months ago