Bible Buddy 365 Daily Reading Day 1 of 365 Genesis 1, 2, 3. Holy Bible NLT

Hello everyone and welcome to Bible Buddy. My name is Cindy Tran. I invite you to join me in reading the Bible with me daily. Today we will be reading from Genesis 1, 2, 3.

I will be reading from the New Living Translation. (NLT)

I suggest you say a prayer and ask God to open your ears, mind and heart before you start reading the Bible.

If you like this video, subscribe to this channel and read along with me.

May God bless you and yours.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." John 1:1

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Bible
• read
• readers
• Daily
• Reading
• preaching
• gospels
• Luke
• Mark
• Matthew
• Psalm
• praise
• Holy
• Spirit
• Commandments
• Old
• Testament
• New
• Psalms
• Buddy
• 365
• love
• John
• 3:15
• verses
• scriptures

[asianjovi]

Come to me, all who are weary and carry heavy laden, and I will give you rest." Matthew 11:28

[roodyhoo]

@microaquarius Interesting. I've never heard it that way before. I wonder why Adam didn't just ask God why he couldn't have that particular fruit.  Since God walked with man in those days, I'm sure he would have given Adam a very simple, yet profound answer. Great Point!!!

[muccisbistro]

YAY!!!!

[eppsman808]

I have read the Old and the New Testament and I Have been trying to make sense of alot of these writings but who is to say what is literal and what is metaphor? Everything created in 6 days. In the beginning he made light, day night Day 1. Day 4 he creates the Sun Moon and the stars to separate the day from the night again. Day 3 he created plants before the sun?????? and this is just the first page. I enjoy listening to you.

[microaquarius]

@Huttate1

Darwin noticed flaws in his own theory and I appreciate his honesty. Evolution has moved on from there? Ok. Consider this: In 1996, a headline appeared in the papers: "Feathered Fossil Proves Some Dinosaurs Evolved Into Birds" ( The Examiner, Launceston, Tasmania, Oct 1996). This fossil was called Sinosauropteryx prima (Ann Gibbons, Science, 1996). Four leading paleontologists including Yale University's John Ostrom later found the feathers were just a prallel array of fibres,

[microaquarius]

@Huttate1 Cool. A true scientific mind would maybe say something like: There are sedimentation experiments recreated in lab-situations which could tell us more, but there you go.

Science likes questions. ok. Why was the birth of Christ used as a time reference anyway? I mean, if he is just a myth or legend, why bother? Why not using another (more scientific event, lol) that happened around the same time?

[Huttate1]

@microaquarius No, they gave up research when someone explained to them that god did it all.

[Huttate1]

@microaquarius Time for you to grow up. 150 year old quotes? Purlease. 150 years ago electricity & magnetism had not been unified; heavier than air flight was impossible; our galaxy was the only one that existed; we had no germ theory; etc, etc. I realise that your thinking is stuck 2000 years in the past, but Evoloution has moved on from the early and excellent work of Darwin. Only a superstitious fool would quote mine Darwin without educating themselves on the subject.

[Huttate1]

@microaquarius Utter rot.  Evolution is fact. Creation is myth.

[microaquarius]

@Huttate1 Oh yes, I forgot a question: Do you know if scientists are researching current fossilisation processes on softbodies creatures, etc? Because you would think that nothing took place in the past that doesn't take place in the present.

[microaquarius]

@Huttate1 Looking at the scientific consensus (regarding the missing links), just want to add a quote from someone:

'Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain. And this, perhaps is the most obvious and serious objection - which could be urged against the theory.

(Charles Darwin)

Surely, Huttate, we can debate without humiliation but scientific explanation.