RPG-28

RPG-28 antitank disposable grenade launcher /rocket-propelled grenade (Russia)
The RPG-28 is a disposable,single shot rocket launcher pre-loaded with fin-stabilized rocket. The single-piece smoothbore barrel / container is made of fiberglass. The rocket is contained in the barrel tube, and its solid-fuel motor burns out completely within the barrel. Because the barrel is open at the rear to avoid recoil, there is a dangerous backblast area behind the firing weapon.In transport/storage mode both ends of the barrel are closed by the front and rear covers, made of rubber; those covers shallnot be removed manually and are destroyed during the rocket launch. Firing mechanism is cocked manually by rising the rear sight; lovering the rear sight de-cocks the firing mechanism so the grenade can be brough back to safe mode if the there's no immediate target. The launcher tube is also equipped with standard sight rail which can accept telescopic or IR / Night sight in equipment. Since the complete system is quite heavy, it is equipped with shoulder pad below the center of mass, a folding support leg(monopod) at the rear and a folding forward grip in front. The rocket is fin-stabilized (with six switch-blade like fins at the rear), and its solid-propellant motor burns out completely while rocket is still in the barrel. The tandem, dual shaped charge(HEAT) warheads capable of defeating modern and future reactive armor plus at least 900 mm of homogenous steel armor behind it.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• RPG-28
• antitank
• disposable
• grenade
• launcher
• rocket-propelled
• Bazalt
• army
• military
• Weapons
• Russia
• РПГ-28
• реактивная
• противотанковая
• граната
• Базальт
• Россия
• Армия
• РФ

[01e9]

ставь это видео в ответ к моему рпг-7.

[yolkhere]

@01e9

не вопрос, хотя логичнее был бы РПГ-27 ;)

[TATARSTAN59500]

maybe rpg-28 is in barbariancategory lol

haha t-72 nude receved rpg-28 my god explosed in thousand parts

[Talshet]

@BlackBurn092 And still wich systeme is better refers to technic and effectivness,not the opinion what you think is better.Maybe you did mean i like the design more that would be diffrent story.

[BlackBurn092]

@Talshet about & whats with this 190 characters in writing now on youtube?

[BlackBurn092]

@Talshet being recovered something you russians would know about that in ww2 also we took heavy causualties in dieppe because of stupid disesions by are commanders somthing you russians would also kno

[BlackBurn092]

@Talshet & i hate them for that so dont fucking bitch at me for never winning a war we the CANADIANS won ww1 for everyone we were the best fighting force their was but are losses were still

[BlackBurn092]

@Talshet im canadian & we've been fighting longer then you have...also i hate the americans to we kicked their ass & burnt down their white house in 1812 they always think their stuff is suppior

[BlackBurn092]

@Talshet not true i quite favor the T-90 and the Ak-47 because you can put them through just about everything & they'll still work if you even bothered looking at my profile you can im not a american

[Talshet]

@BlackBurn092 This is not an opinion, wich system its better refers to the function and effectivness.People like you hating all russian technologies,tring to trolling and if you can't you just say its my opinion.This is why USA never won a war.You pussies joined only at the end the World War 2 and at this point the winner was clear, russia.

[BlackBurn092]

@Talshet dude piss of its my opion not yours