Pi and Squaring the Circle

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,149
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 12, 2009

In this video we show the viewer how to square a circle, using only a straightedge and compass,
and at the same time also show how the conversion constant for calculating the surface area of a circle is derived.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Pt 1.

    This is not geometric proof. It's geometric nonsense. And in your sidebar info, "we" should be singular.

    There is no such thing as a 4-8-9 right triangle. Everything else is obfuscation, and quite irrelevant, given that you are using a triangle in your proof which cannot exist. You did NOT show the Pythagorean theorem. Adding 1 to each term is pure BS. You did that so you could simply *change* 64 to 65!! And where did you get 8 for BC???

    Cont'd.

  • i work in a warehouse driving a fork lift truck and even i know this is complete bollocks!

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You can prove that the ratio between the circle's circumference and its radius isn't 3:1 merely by empirical testing. 1 counterexample is enough. I can't believe I'm bothering to say this, considering your brain is infected with religion.

  • @Astrobrant2  what he said! >:)

  • ahhhhhhhhhhh WRONG!!!!!!!!! FAIL!!!!!!!! Take this crap down

  • HAHA what a stupid nonsence this is!! Nothing is squared. You can easy see that the area of​the circle is 63,61725124 and the area of​the square is 64.

    All the rest is not true too. The Pythagorean theorem states a^2 + b^2 = c^2 and not a^2 +1 + b^2 +1 = c^2 + 1 so as you can see you have add 1 to the right side and 2 to the left site with would be the same as you say 2+3 = 5 so 2+1 + 3+1 = 5 +1 . Now 3 + 4 is clearly not equal to 6 .

    A religious idiot ? Plz stop

  • Incorrect. Your version require degree and angles. Thus more than a straightedge is required. A ruler, while it is a straight edge a straightedge is not always a ruler.

    w w w.flickr.com /photos /sacred_geometry /5497024890/

    This is what it should look like.

  • bull shit.....

  • This is horse shit.

  • This is what happens when people smoke too much weed and then they decide to "write history".

  • Pt 3.

    But the simplest disproof of this nonsense is yet to come:

    The radius is 4.5. So the area of the circle is (4.5)^2 times pi. That's 63.6172.... NOT 64.

    As squaring "proofs" go, this one is pretty dumb. I've seen much better, but they're wrong, too.

    Stop mis-informing people. Do the right thing and take this video down, since it is pure BS and likely to confuse beginning geometry students.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more