Jonathan Glover, The Politics and Psychology of the New World Order
2004 Kenan Distinguished Lecture in Ethics
November 1, 2004
Glover, Professor of Ethics at Kings College, University of London, and Director of the Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, examined the political choices and psychological traps humanity must navigate in the twenty-first century.
Glover is the author of several books on ethics, including the recent Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century, an exploration of human capacities and resources for good and evil, and Causing Death and Saving Lives. He chaired a European Commission Working Party on Assisted Reproduction that produced Ethics of New Reproductive Technologies: The Glover Report. He has edited Utilitarianism and its Critics and (with Martha Nussbaum) Women, Culture, and Development.
Dr. Glover gained a reputation as an outstanding lecturer and tutor during his many years at Oxford University, where he was a Fellow of New College. In 2003 he presented the Tanner Lectures on Human Values at Princeton University on the topic Towards Humanism in Psychiatry. The Tanner Lectureship recognizes uncommon achievement and outstanding abilities in the field of human values.
Among his interests are questions raised by the Human Genome Project. A video produced in 1982 by the BBC, Brave New Babies?, features Dr. Glover as he introduces and examines issues related to new techniques in genetic engineering. He work currently focuses on the philosophy of mental illness and ethical issues in psychiatry, in particular the nature of psychopathology.
The 2004 Kenan Distinguished Lecture in Ethics was cosponsored by the Center for International Studies, the Center for the Study of Medical Ethics & Humanities, the Institute for Genome Sciences and Policys Center for Genome ethics, Law, and Policy, and the Office of the President.
great strategy .. thanks for posting .. =)
fivequotes 1 month ago
Seems like he took the unsubstantiated path towards an unsustainable utopia.
Waste of time.
VictorRenkel 9 months ago
A proposal that creates problems is a bad proposal. The premis of the lecture is wrong, the world is not threatened by terrorists. This man has the superior/inferior cause of agression right, which is not a big achievement. The rest is fudging.
eurogoldexchange 1 year ago
Extremely weak... talked for like 3 min on subject then goes on a tangent totally off subject, and talking in meaningless circles... wtf?
Roccdrummer 2 years ago
i blame psychiatry puplic enemy number one with drugs that make people insane and cause mass destuction of the human mind is that ethical? psychology is the study of the brain not the mind or the spirit what do we get out this lecture?
wachnathan 2 years ago