Burning Building in Bangkok
Uploader Comments (JoeyandJon)
All Comments (12)
-
Yeah the top is much more heavy than the bottom because the bottom is closer to the ground... and never mind the bottom has to support the middle and the top.
-
Oh so if it is just the top, that makes it more unstable compared to the whole building being ablaze?
-
This fire burnt so differently from WTC, don't even bother comparing them.
WTC fire only burnt at a section with the top part still in tact, which was an immense weight to withstand.
-
well actually there r some terroists in bangkok...but if u think about it they r everywhere.... but yeah this isn't terroist
-
you said it. EXCUSE.
steel melting point 2500 degree
jet fuel burning max temperature 1200 degree
estimated jet fuel fires in the WTC 800 degree
not even close.
-
i think he was been sarcastic...
-
this has nothing to do with terrorists! it was an electrical fire in an elevator! jeez! get over yourself!
-
Damn terrorists...ther in Bangkok too!
-
Americas excuse was that the jet fuel burned at a much higher temperature, which melted the structure.
-
Asshole.
Wow, but why didn't those buildings explode into a billion pieces and fall at near freefall speeds like the Twin Towers did in New York City. World Trade Center Building 7 was as tall as the Bangkok buildings, but it fell at freefall speed from fire and a little structural damage to it's South facade from the exploding North Tower.
youtubeDOTcom/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk
Hmmmmm....
SteveM818 4 years ago 2
That's what I was afraid of... more or less... so I got pretty far away from the fire. Other people were walking towards it, even though the fire dept. and police were saying not to.
JoeyandJon 4 years ago