Charlie Rose - Steven Chu

Steven Chu, United States Secretary of Energy

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Steven Chu
• Energy

[daderone]

Please put up the whole video like you used to do! I caught this on TV last night, this man is very smart. What a good pick for the job.

Post the whole video it was a great interview. Charlie Rose rocks!

[rudy4histo]

I love this guy, Nobel Prize winner and visionary energy guru to boot.

[FKOlive898]

I like

[Petekiv]

Why isn't this dirty, homosexual, illegal, muslim coon, not in jail right now. Even starting with just hi SS # Fraud and morso, he is a Uganda citizen. Throw this porch monkey and his fat, ugly, size 14 shoed wife, michelle in prison also. Rick Wiles explains. Also: Her Name is Miss Ann. I respect James Manning, Paine, Corsi and Atlah, but the rest of the coons can't run a shoeshine stand. When will Hillary send Huma to an early grave?

[33noa33]

In the northwestern Australia, we have huge tides,

huge evaporation and huge dry rivers and lakes.

Tides are up to 12m. Evaporation is up to 4m per year and can be increased.

Huge 12m tidal erosion can revive old dry paleo dormant once mighty rivers, creeks and lakes,

desalinate the country and change deserts to rain forests to provide more rain across Australia.

World population is growing rapidly and we need more energy, food, land and water.

see: mitic climate engineering

[scout6686]

@rudy4histo amen

[jrich777]

i mean, dont you want a president who can trap atoms with lasers?

[jrich777]

Chu For President 2012. who's more qualified, really, i mean really really

[seaplaneguy1]

Jay, Did you actually read what I said above???? Try reading it a thousand times and then make an apology to me...thanks in advance...

There is a way to get 70-90% of the fuel required out of the system...get it? Think before you comment...Turn your brain on, please...

[jayatfreelance]

You fly a seaplane? No wonder you argue the way you do - you're a polluter!

[seaplaneguy1]

When the cost of fuel becomes a small fraction of the capital cost, people don't care about fuel cost. What if you had a 500 mpg car ($800 for the life of the car)? Would you care about fuel costs over ten years when one bad battery could cost you 10k? The assumptions Mr Chue makes fall apart when the marginal cost if a small part of the total cost. Basic economics people! If we cut 90% of the need for fuel (25x9=225mpg city, soon to come!), what will a gal of gas cost? < $1? Wake up!

[seaplaneguy1]

Mr. Chu is again wrong. Ask..if I had a Nuke car that needed no fuel during it's life. How much more would you pay? An Otto engine is 10-20% city/highway. What if a new engine were 60-70% (here in 5 years!)? At $2/gal and 200k miles, old engine (25 mpg,say) burns 6 time as much fuel....8000 gal vs 8000/6=1333..net saving 6666gals. $16,000 vs 2666. If the car costs 26k, the new car fuel is only 10%...old is 60%. Fuel is then a small part, and the price of fuel does not matter as much...